Austinvs
LondonAustin vs London: cost, size & quality of life compared
Trying to decide between Austin and London? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.
Austin comes out ahead overall — by a narrow edge.
But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:
AustinAustinAustinAustinComposite scores
Overall: Austin wins by 0.5 points
Population & size
Is Austin bigger than London?
London is the bigger city: about 9.0M people versus Austin's 1.0M — roughly 9.0× larger.
City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.
National income
Is Austin richer than London?
United States is the higher earner — average annual wage of $82,933 against $63,691 in United Kingdom, about 30% more in purchasing-power terms.
Country-level figures — Austin is not United States and London is not United Kingdom, and both cities typically pay above their national average. Gross, before tax: see take-home pay by country for what lands in the account.
Distance
How far is Austin from London?
Austin is about 7,910 km (4,910 mi) from London in a straight line — roughly 10 h 05 m of nonstop flight time.
Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.
Climate
Is Austin warmer than London?
Austin is the warmer city: January highs average 17°C vs 8°C, and July 36°C vs 23°C. Austin gets noticeably more sun — about 1,040 more sunshine hours per year.
| Month | Austin | London |
|---|---|---|
| January (high / low) | 17° / 7°C | 8° / 2°C |
| July (high / low) | 36° / 23°C | 23° / 14°C |
Humid subtropical. Hot long summers (often 38°C+), mild winters with occasional cold snaps. High UV most of the year.
Famously gray and damp. Mild winters compared to continental peers, cool summers — heatwaves above 30°C still rare.
Austin edges London by a narrow margin, 0.5 points, driven primarily by lower cost-of-living and faster job growth offsetting London's superior transit infrastructure.
At 5.4 versus 4.9, Austin trails major global cities but benefits from being the only top-tier tech hub without London's housing affordability crisis.
If cost matters more than walkability, Austin wins; if you prioritize public transit density and cultural institutions, the narrow gap suggests London's premium justifies the price for your priorities.
Data signals
What separates Austin and London
How decisive
Austin comes out ahead by 0.5 composite points — a narrow edge.
Biggest difference
The widest gap is remote-work friendliness, where Austin leads by 2.0 points.
Where they match
They're most evenly matched on quality of life — within 0.3 points of each other.
Overall cost gap
Total monthly costs in London run about 41% higher than in Austin.
Where budgets split most
Transport is the line item that diverges most: roughly 544% pricier in London than Austin.
Size difference
London is the larger metro — about 9.0× the population of the other, which shapes commute times, housing supply and how "big-city" daily life feels.
Home internet
Austin has the faster typical broadband (280 vs 170 Mbps median) — worth weighing if you work remotely or move large files.
Score-by-score, side-by-side
Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.
The exact scores and winners:
| Axis | Austin | London | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affordability | 5.1 | 3.2 | Austin +1.9 |
| Quality of life | 6.7 | 6.4 | Austin +0.3 |
| Remote-work friendliness | 7.9 | 5.9 | Austin +2.0 |
| Healthcare | 6.4 | 8.3 | London +1.9 |
Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.
Affordability
- Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)52
- Rent index (weight 40%)44
How this is calculated
Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Austin: ((100 − 52)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 44)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 5.1.
Austin is mid-range on absolute cost. Affordability is reasonable but not its main advantage.
Quality of life
- Safety index (weight 40%)60
- Healthcare index (weight 35%)70
- Air quality index (weight 25%)75
How this is calculated
QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Austin: (60/100 × 0.4 + 70/100 × 0.35 + 75/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.7.
Austin has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.
Remote-work friendliness
- Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)280 Mbps
- Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)16.6%
- Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)52
How this is calculated
RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Austin: (min(280/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.166) × 0.3 + (100 − 52)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.9.
Austin combines fast internet (280 Mbps median), a 17% effective income tax and cost index 52 — a strong configuration for remote workers earning in a stronger currency.
Healthcare
- Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)70
- Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)251
How this is calculated
Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Austin: (70/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 251/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 6.4.
Austin has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~251 USD/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.
Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.
Affordability
- Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)70
- Rent index (weight 40%)65
How this is calculated
Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For London: ((100 − 70)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 65)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.2.
London is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.
Quality of life
- Safety index (weight 40%)60
- Healthcare index (weight 35%)75
- Air quality index (weight 25%)55
How this is calculated
QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For London: (60/100 × 0.4 + 75/100 × 0.35 + 55/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.4.
London has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.
Remote-work friendliness
- Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)170 Mbps
- Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)14.8%
- Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)70
How this is calculated
RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For London: (min(170/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.1478) × 0.3 + (100 − 70)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.9.
London works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 170 Mbps, income tax 15%, cost index 70.
Healthcare
- Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)75
- Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)0
How this is calculated
Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For London: (75/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 0/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.3.
London combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~0 GBP/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.
Monthly cost delta: Austin vs London
Normalized to USD at 1 GBP = 1.3201 USD.
| Category | Austin | London | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| housing | $1,939 | £2,233 | +52% |
| food | $334 | £292 | +15% |
| transport | $41 | £200 | +544% |
| utilities | $221 | £275 | +64% |
| leisure | $334 | £324 | +28% |
| healthcare | $251 | £0 | -100% |
Where each city's money goes
Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.
The biggest shape difference is healthcare: Austin spends 8.0 percentage points more of its budget on it (8% vs. 0%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.
Buying property
Apartment prices: Austin vs London
Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.
Buying in central Austin runs about 54% cheaper per square meter (€5,500/m² vs €12,000/m²).
Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.
Getting around
Public transport: Austin vs London
Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.
CapMetro 31-day pass; one MetroRail commuter line plus buses. Most residents drive.
Single ride: €1.2 · Modes: Light rail, Bus
Travelcard zones 1-2 ≈ £170/mo; Oyster pay-as-you-go with daily caps is usually cheaper than the monthly for most commute patterns.
Day pass: €8.5 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry, Light rail
Salary equivalence: Austin ↔ London
What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Austin = 52, London = 70); currency-converted at 1 GBP = 1.3201 USD. Tax differences are not modeled.
| Austin gross | London equivalent |
|---|---|
| $40,000 | £40,789 |
| $75,000 | £76,479 |
| $120,000 | £122,366 |
| London gross | Austin equivalent |
|---|---|
| £40,000 | $39,226 |
| £75,000 | $73,550 |
| £120,000 | $117,679 |
Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.
Pros and cons
Why pick Austin
- Wins on affordability (+1.9 points vs London).
- Wins on quality of life (+0.3 points vs London).
- Wins on remote-work friendliness (+2.0 points vs London).
Why pick London
- Wins on healthcare (+1.9 points vs Austin).
Austin trade-offs
- Trails London on healthcare by 1.9 points.
London trade-offs
- Trails Austin on affordability by 1.9 points.
- Trails Austin on remote-work friendliness by 2.0 points.
Remote work logistics
Time zones and language: Austin vs London
Austin (America/Chicago) and London (Europe/London) sit 6 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 2 hours a day.
Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed
English-native. Spanish significant in specific neighborhoods (east side) but English universal. Texan accent is mild compared to other Southern cities.
Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed
English-native. Multicultural enough that other languages are common in specific neighborhoods but English is the universal default for everything.
Who should choose which
The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.
Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.
Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork
Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.
Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare
Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.
Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability
Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.
Axes scored: affordability
Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.
Zoom out from cities to countries: compare United States vs United Kingdom on average wage, take-home after tax and cost of living.
Going deeper
Visa landscape for both countries — and case studies that touch this corridor.
Tools that work for either choice
Some links below are affiliate links — if you sign up we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you.
How this page is calculated
Data sources
- Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-28 (Austin) and 2026-05-23 (London).
- FX rate. 1 GBP = 1.3201 USD, used to normalize cost baskets.
- CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
- ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.
Update cadence
Data as of . Last reviewed .
Calculation
For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Austin is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.
Limitations
- Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
- Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
- Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
- Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.
Frequently asked questions
Austin vs London: which is cheaper?
Austin is roughly 41% cheaper than London on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Austin has cost index 52 vs London at 70 (both with New York = 100).
Which city has better quality of life?
Austin scores 6.5/10 on the Mundevo composite versus London at 6.0/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Austin wins overall by 0.5 points.
Is Austin or London better for remote work?
Austin has 280 Mbps median internet vs London at 170 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.
Is Austin bigger than London?
London is larger — about 9.0M people versus Austin's 1.0M, roughly 9.0× the size.
Is Austin safer than London?
Austin and London score similarly on safety (60 vs 60 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index).
Should I move to Austin or London?
It depends on what you weight. Austin wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.5 points, but Austin is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.