Austinvs
MedellinAustin vs Medellin: cost, quality of life, and the winner
Austin (composite 5.4) vs Medellin (composite 5.5). Side-by-side on affordability, quality of life, remote-work friendliness and healthcare — with the calculation behind each score.
Composite scores
Overall: Medellin wins by 0.1 points
Medellin edges Austin by 0.1 points, a negligible margin that masks fundamentally different city trajectories: Austin's score reflects tech-boom saturation while Medellin's reflects genuine urban renaissance from violence-era lows.
Both cities score near identical 5.4-5.5 ranges, yet Medellin's gain represents steeper momentum than Austin's plateau in the same timeframe.
If you're seeking established tech infrastructure, Austin delivers; if you want emerging growth potential with lower costs, Medellin's trajectory suggests better upside for the next five years.
Score-by-score, side-by-side
Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.
| Axis | Austin | Medellin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affordability | 2.3 | 6.9 | Medellin +4.6 |
| Quality of life | 6.7 | 5.4 | Austin +1.3 |
| Remote-work friendliness | 7.2 | 5.6 | Austin +1.6 |
| Healthcare | 5.2 | 4.2 | Austin +1.0 |
Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.
Affordability
- Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)78
- Rent index (weight 40%)75
How this is calculated
Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Austin: ((100 − 78)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 75)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 2.3.
Austin is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.
Quality of life
- Safety index (weight 40%)60
- Healthcare index (weight 35%)70
- Air quality index (weight 25%)75
How this is calculated
QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Austin: (60/100 × 0.4 + 70/100 × 0.35 + 75/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.7.
Austin has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.
Remote-work friendliness
- Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)280 Mbps
- Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)17.0%
- Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)78
How this is calculated
RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Austin: (min(280/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.17) × 0.3 + (100 − 78)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.2.
Austin combines fast internet (280 Mbps median), a 17% effective income tax and cost index 78 — a strong configuration for remote workers earning in a stronger currency.
Healthcare
- Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)70
- Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)450
How this is calculated
Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Austin: (70/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 450/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 5.2.
Austin has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~450 USD/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.
Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.
Affordability
- Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)35
- Rent index (weight 40%)25
How this is calculated
Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Medellin: ((100 − 35)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 25)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 6.9.
Medellin is mid-range on absolute cost. Affordability is reasonable but not its main advantage.
Quality of life
- Safety index (weight 40%)50
- Healthcare index (weight 35%)60
- Air quality index (weight 25%)50
How this is calculated
QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Medellin: (50/100 × 0.4 + 60/100 × 0.35 + 50/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.4.
Medellin has a mixed quality profile. Safety: fair; healthcare: good; air: fair. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.
Remote-work friendliness
- Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)90 Mbps
- Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)14.0%
- Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)35
How this is calculated
RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Medellin: (min(90/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.14) × 0.3 + (100 − 35)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.6.
Medellin works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 90 Mbps, income tax 14%, cost index 35.
Healthcare
- Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)60
- Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)250000
How this is calculated
Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Medellin: (60/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 250000/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 4.2.
Medellin has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~250000 COP/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.
Monthly cost delta: Austin vs Medellin
Normalized to USD at 1 COP = 0.0002 USD.
| Category | Austin | Medellin | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| housing | $2,200 | COP 2,800,000 | -69% |
| food | $600 | COP 1,100,000 | -55% |
| transport | $60 | COP 130,000 | -47% |
| utilities | $220 | COP 300,000 | -67% |
| leisure | $600 | COP 800,000 | -67% |
| healthcare | $450 | COP 250,000 | -86% |
Where each city's money goes
Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.
The biggest shape difference is healthcare: Austin spends 6.2 percentage points more of its budget on it (11% vs. 5%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.
Salary equivalence: Austin ↔ Medellin
What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Austin = 78, Medellin = 35); currency-converted at 1 COP = 0.0002 USD. Tax differences are not modeled.
| Austin gross | Medellin equivalent |
|---|---|
| $40,000 | COP 73,124,406 |
| $75,000 | COP 137,108,262 |
| $120,000 | COP 219,373,219 |
| Medellin gross | Austin equivalent |
|---|---|
| COP 40,000 | $22 |
| COP 75,000 | $41 |
| COP 120,000 | $66 |
Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.
Pros and cons
Why pick Austin
- Wins on quality of life (+1.3 points vs Medellin).
- Wins on remote-work friendliness (+1.6 points vs Medellin).
- Wins on healthcare (+1.0 points vs Medellin).
Why pick Medellin
- Wins on affordability (+4.6 points vs Austin).
Austin trade-offs
- Trails Medellin on affordability by 4.6 points.
Medellin trade-offs
- Trails Austin on quality of life by 1.3 points.
- Trails Austin on remote-work friendliness by 1.6 points.
- Trails Austin on healthcare by 1.0 points.
Who should choose which
The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.
Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.
Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork
Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.
Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare
Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.
Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability
Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.
Axes scored: affordability
Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.
Going deeper
Visa landscape for both countries — and case studies that touch this corridor.
Tools that work for either choice
Some links below are affiliate links — if you sign up we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you.
How this page is calculated
Data sources
- Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-28 (Austin) and 2026-05-29 (Medellin).
- FX rate. 1 COP = 0.0002 USD, used to normalize cost baskets.
- CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
- ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.
Update cadence
Data as of . Last reviewed .
Calculation
For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Austin is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.
Limitations
- Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
- Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
- Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
- Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.
Frequently asked questions
Austin vs Medellin: which is cheaper?
Medellin is roughly 68% cheaper than Austin on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Austin has cost index 78 vs Medellin at 35 (both with New York = 100).
Which city has better quality of life?
Austin scores 5.4/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Medellin at 5.5/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Medellin wins overall by 0.1 points.
Is Austin or Medellin better for remote work?
Austin has 280 Mbps median internet vs Medellin at 90 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.