Mundevo
City comparison·Australia flagBrisbanevsItaly flagRome

Brisbane vs Rome: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between Brisbane and Rome? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

Brisbane and Rome are almost dead even overall.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
Brisbane flagBrisbane
Cheaper
Brisbane flagBrisbane
Quality of life
Brisbane flagBrisbane
Remote work
Rome flagRome

Composite scores

Overall: Brisbane wins by 0.0 points

Brisbane composite
5.6 / 10
fair
Rome composite
5.6 / 10
fair

Population & size

Is Brisbane bigger than Rome?

Rome is the bigger city: about 2.9M people versus Brisbane's 2.6M — roughly 1.1× larger.

Brisbane population
2.6M
2,600,000
Rome population
2.9M
2,870,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is Brisbane from Rome?

Brisbane is about 16,110 km (10,010 mi) from Rome in a straight line — roughly 19 h 40 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
16,110 km
In miles
10,010 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
19 h 40 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is Brisbane warmer than Rome?

Brisbane is the warmer city: January highs average 30°C vs 13°C, and July 22°C vs 31°C. Brisbane gets noticeably more sun — about 370 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
Brisbane
2,840
Rome
2,470
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
Brisbane
1,140 mm
Rome
800 mm
MonthBrisbaneRome
January (high / low)30° / 21°C13° / 4°C
July (high / low)22° / 9°C31° / 19°C
Brisbane

Humid subtropical. Warm humid summers (storm season Nov-Mar), mild dry winters. The most consistently sunny major Australian city.

Rome

Mediterranean. Hot, dry summers and mild winters — pleasant year-round but August heat regularly tops 35°C.

Analyst take

Brisbane and Rome tie at 5.6, but Brisbane wins on the tiebreaker—a rare occurrence that suggests the Australian city edges out the Italian capital on a secondary metric that matters.

Rome typically dominates cultural heritage rankings, so Brisbane matching its score indicates strength in categories Rome doesn't traditionally lead: livability, cost, or climate factors.

What to do

Compare the specific category breakdowns between these two to understand what drives Brisbane's competitive edge; it likely reveals what modern cities are prioritizing over pure historical prestige.

Data signals

What separates Brisbane and Rome

  • How decisive

    Brisbane comes out ahead by 0.0 composite points — essentially a tie.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is quality of life, where Brisbane leads by 1.1 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on affordability — within 0.2 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in Rome run about 2% higher than in Brisbane.

  • Where budgets split most

    Transport is the line item that diverges most: roughly 64% cheaper in Rome than Brisbane.

  • Safety

    Brisbane scores higher on safety (65 vs 55 / 100) — a common deciding factor for families.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
Brisbane
3.2/10
Rome
3.4/10
Quality of life
Brisbane
7.3/10
Rome
6.2/10
Remote-work friendliness
Brisbane
4.4/10
Rome
4.7/10
Healthcare
Brisbane
7.5/10
Rome
8.2/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisBrisbaneRomeWinner
Affordability3.23.4Rome +0.2
Quality of life7.36.2Brisbane +1.1
Remote-work friendliness4.44.7Rome +0.3
Healthcare7.58.2Rome +0.7
Score card · Brisbane
5.6/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

3.2poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)72
  • Rent index (weight 40%)62
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Brisbane: ((100 − 72)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 62)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.2.

Brisbane is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

7.3good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)65
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)76
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)80
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Brisbane: (65/100 × 0.4 + 76/100 × 0.35 + 80/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.3.

Brisbane scores good on safety, good on healthcare and excellent on air. The composite quality-of-life signal is strong.

Remote-work friendliness

4.4fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)90 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)23.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)72
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Brisbane: (min(90/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.23) × 0.3 + (100 − 72)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.4.

Brisbane works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 90 Mbps, income tax 23%, cost index 72.

Healthcare

7.5good
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)76
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)140
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Brisbane: (76/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 140/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 7.5.

Brisbane combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~140 AUD/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Score card · Rome
5.6/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

3.4poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)75
  • Rent index (weight 40%)52
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Rome: ((100 − 75)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 52)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.4.

Rome is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.2good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)55
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)78
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)52
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Rome: (55/100 × 0.4 + 78/100 × 0.35 + 52/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.2.

Rome has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: fair. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

4.7fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)120 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)25.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)75
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Rome: (min(120/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.25) × 0.3 + (100 − 75)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.7.

Rome works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 120 Mbps, income tax 25%, cost index 75.

Healthcare

8.2excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)78
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)40
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Rome: (78/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 40/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.2.

Rome combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~40 EUR/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Monthly cost delta: Brisbane vs Rome

Normalized to AUD at 1 EUR = 1.6500 AUD.

CategoryBrisbaneRomeChange
housingA$2,200€1,300-3%
foodA$600€400+10%
transportA$160€35-64%
utilitiesA$200€170+40%
leisureA$400€350+44%
healthcareA$140€40-53%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

Brisbane59% housing
Rome57% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is leisure: Rome spends 4.4 percentage points more of its budget on it (15% vs. 11%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: Brisbane vs Rome

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central Rome runs about 13% cheaper per square meter (€6,500/m² vs €7,500/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
Brisbane
€7,500/m²
Rome
€6,500/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
Brisbane
€5,500/m²
Rome
€4,500/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: Brisbane vs Rome

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
Brisbane
€85
Rome
€35
Brisbane

Translink go card; CityCat ferries on the Brisbane River are part of the network — fast and scenic commute.

Day pass: €4.5 · Modes: Light rail, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry

Rome

ATAC monthly pass; the metro has only 3 lines because Roman archaeology blocks expansion, so bus networks carry most of the load.

Day pass: €7 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail

Salary equivalence: Brisbane ↔ Rome

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Brisbane = 72, Rome = 75); currency-converted at 1 EUR = 1.6500 AUD. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in Brisbane, moving to Rome
AUD → equivalent EUR
Brisbane grossRome equivalent
A$40,000€25,253
A$75,000€47,348
A$120,000€75,758
Earning in Rome, moving to Brisbane
EUR → equivalent AUD
Rome grossBrisbane equivalent
€40,000A$63,360
€75,000A$118,800
€120,000A$190,080

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick Brisbane

  • Wins on quality of life (+1.1 points vs Rome).

Why pick Rome

  • Wins on remote-work friendliness (+0.3 points vs Brisbane).
  • Wins on healthcare (+0.7 points vs Brisbane).

Brisbane trade-offs

  • Trails Rome on healthcare by 0.7 points.

Rome trade-offs

  • Trails Brisbane on quality of life by 1.1 points.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: Brisbane vs Rome

Brisbane (Australia/Brisbane) and Rome (Europe/Rome) sit 9 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 8 hours a day. Note: Rome observes daylight saving while Brisbane doesn't, so the gap shifts by an hour part of the year.

Brisbane

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native, Australian variant. Functionally universal across the city.

Rome

Official: Italian · English: Moderate · Local language: Recommended

Italian needed for daily-life bureaucracy. English in international firms and tourism but limited in most local services. Italian fluency materially helps the relocation experience.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Rome by 0.2 points
Brisbane3.8/10
Rome4.0/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
Brisbane by 0.2 points
Brisbane7.4/10
Rome7.2/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.1)
Brisbane6.0/10
Rome5.9/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.2)
Brisbane3.2/10
Rome3.4/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Zoom out from cities to countries: compare Australia vs Italy on average wage, take-home after tax and cost of living.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-28 (Brisbane) and 2026-05-28 (Rome).
  • FX rate. 1 EUR = 1.6500 AUD, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Brisbane is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

Brisbane vs Rome: which is cheaper?

Brisbane is roughly 2% cheaper than Rome on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Brisbane has cost index 72 vs Rome at 75 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

Brisbane scores 5.6/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Rome at 5.6/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Brisbane wins overall by 0.0 points.

Is Brisbane or Rome better for remote work?

Brisbane has 90 Mbps median internet vs Rome at 120 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is Brisbane bigger than Rome?

Rome is larger — about 2.9M people versus Brisbane's 2.6M, roughly 1.1× the size.

Is Brisbane safer than Rome?

Brisbane scores higher on safety — 65 vs 55 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to Brisbane or Rome?

It depends on what you weight. Brisbane wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.0 points, but Brisbane is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.