Casablancavs
ManilaCasablanca vs Manila: cost, size & quality of life compared
Casablanca (composite 5.4) vs Manila (composite 5.2). Side-by-side on cost of living, population & size, affordability, quality of life, remote-work friendliness and healthcare — with the calculation behind each score.
Composite scores
Overall: Casablanca wins by 0.2 points
Population & size
Is Casablanca bigger than Manila?
Casablanca is the bigger city: about 3.4M people versus Manila's 1.8M — roughly 1.9× larger.
City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.
Casablanca edges out Manila on the Mundevo composite, 5.4 to 5.2 out of 10 — a narrow 0.2-point margin across safety, healthcare, air quality and cost.
The composite gap is small enough that one weighted axis can flip the result. Use the per-axis breakdown below to see which city wins your specific priorities — someone optimizing for healthcare can land on a different answer than someone optimizing for affordability.
Run the salary calculator for both cities at your target lifestyle before deciding — Casablanca winning on quality doesn't mean the gross-salary requirement also lands in your favor. If you're on a balanced tier, the cost-of-living pages for each city carry the full monthly basket and the gross-salary figure.
Data signals
What separates Casablanca and Manila
How decisive
Casablanca comes out ahead by 0.2 composite points — a narrow edge.
Biggest difference
The widest gap is quality of life, where Casablanca leads by 0.6 points.
Where they match
They're most evenly matched on affordability — within 0.0 points of each other.
Overall cost gap
Total monthly costs in Manila run about 18% lower than in Casablanca.
Where budgets split most
Utilities is the line item that diverges most: roughly 60% pricier in Manila than Casablanca.
Score-by-score, side-by-side
Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.
| Axis | Casablanca | Manila | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affordability | 7.4 | 7.4 | Casablanca +0.0 |
| Quality of life | 4.9 | 4.3 | Casablanca +0.6 |
| Remote-work friendliness | 5.0 | 5.2 | Manila +0.2 |
| Healthcare | 4.2 | 3.8 | Casablanca +0.4 |
Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.
Affordability
- Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)34
- Rent index (weight 40%)14
How this is calculated
Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Casablanca: ((100 − 34)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 14)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 7.4.
Casablanca sits well below the New York baseline on both cost-of-living and rent. Budgets stretch further here than in benchmark Tier-1 cities.
Quality of life
- Safety index (weight 40%)46
- Healthcare index (weight 35%)52
- Air quality index (weight 25%)48
How this is calculated
QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Casablanca: (46/100 × 0.4 + 52/100 × 0.35 + 48/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.9.
Casablanca has a mixed quality profile. Safety: fair; healthcare: fair; air: fair. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.
Remote-work friendliness
- Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)50 Mbps
- Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)12.0%
- Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)34
How this is calculated
RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Casablanca: (min(50/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.12) × 0.3 + (100 − 34)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.
Casablanca works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 50 Mbps, income tax 12%, cost index 34.
Healthcare
- Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)52
- Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)400
How this is calculated
Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Casablanca: (52/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 400/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 4.2.
Casablanca has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is fair, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~400 MAD/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.
Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.
Affordability
- Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)34
- Rent index (weight 40%)15
How this is calculated
Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Manila: ((100 − 34)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 15)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 7.4.
Manila sits well below the New York baseline on both cost-of-living and rent. Budgets stretch further here than in benchmark Tier-1 cities.
Quality of life
- Safety index (weight 40%)35
- Healthcare index (weight 35%)54
- Air quality index (weight 25%)40
How this is calculated
QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Manila: (35/100 × 0.4 + 54/100 × 0.35 + 40/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.3.
Manila has a mixed quality profile. Safety: fair; healthcare: fair; air: fair. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.
Remote-work friendliness
- Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)60 Mbps
- Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)12.0%
- Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)34
How this is calculated
RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Manila: (min(60/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.12) × 0.3 + (100 − 34)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.2.
Manila works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 60 Mbps, income tax 12%, cost index 34.
Healthcare
- Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)54
- Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)1500
How this is calculated
Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Manila: (54/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 1500/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 3.8.
Manila has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is fair, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~1500 PHP/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.
Monthly cost delta: Casablanca vs Manila
Normalized to MAD at 1 PHP = 0.1742 MAD.
| Category | Casablanca | Manila | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| housing | MAD 4,500 | ₱22,000 | -15% |
| food | MAD 2,500 | ₱11,000 | -23% |
| transport | MAD 250 | ₱1,200 | -16% |
| utilities | MAD 600 | ₱5,500 | +60% |
| leisure | MAD 3,000 | ₱12,000 | -30% |
| healthcare | MAD 400 | ₱1,500 | -35% |
Where each city's money goes
Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.
The biggest shape difference is utilities: Manila spends 5.0 percentage points more of its budget on it (10% vs. 5%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.
Salary equivalence: Casablanca ↔ Manila
What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Casablanca = 34, Manila = 34); currency-converted at 1 PHP = 0.1742 MAD. Tax differences are not modeled.
| Casablanca gross | Manila equivalent |
|---|---|
| MAD 40,000 | ₱229,630 |
| MAD 75,000 | ₱430,556 |
| MAD 120,000 | ₱688,889 |
| Manila gross | Casablanca equivalent |
|---|---|
| ₱40,000 | MAD 6,968 |
| ₱75,000 | MAD 13,065 |
| ₱120,000 | MAD 20,903 |
Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.
Pros and cons
Why pick Casablanca
- Wins on quality of life (+0.6 points vs Manila).
- Wins on healthcare (+0.4 points vs Manila).
Why pick Manila
Manila doesn't have any standout advantages of ≥0.3 points on the scoring model.
Casablanca trade-offs
No material trade-offs versus Manila on the scored axes.
Manila trade-offs
- Trails Casablanca on quality of life by 0.6 points.
Who should choose which
The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.
Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.
Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork
Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.
Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare
Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.
Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability
Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.
Axes scored: affordability
Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.
Tools that work for either choice
Some links below are affiliate links — if you sign up we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you.
How this page is calculated
Data sources
- Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-06-10 (Casablanca) and 2026-06-10 (Manila).
- FX rate. 1 PHP = 0.1742 MAD, used to normalize cost baskets.
- CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
- ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.
Update cadence
Data as of . Last reviewed .
Calculation
For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Casablanca is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.
Limitations
- Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
- Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
- Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
- Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.
Frequently asked questions
Casablanca vs Manila: which is cheaper?
Manila is roughly 18% cheaper than Casablanca on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Casablanca has cost index 34 vs Manila at 34 (both with New York = 100).
Which city has better quality of life?
Casablanca scores 5.4/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Manila at 5.2/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Casablanca wins overall by 0.2 points.
Is Casablanca or Manila better for remote work?
Casablanca has 50 Mbps median internet vs Manila at 60 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.