Mundevo
City comparison·United States flagChicagovsItaly flagRome

Chicago vs Rome: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between Chicago and Rome? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

Rome comes out ahead overall — by a narrow edge.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
Rome flagRome
Cheaper
Rome flagRome
Quality of life
Rome flagRome
Remote work
Chicago flagChicago

Composite scores

Overall: Rome wins by 0.5 points

Chicago composite
5.1 / 10
fair
Rome composite
5.6 / 10
fair

Population & size

Is Chicago bigger than Rome?

Chicago and Rome are roughly the same size — about 2.7M and 2.9M people respectively.

Chicago population
2.7M
2,700,000
Rome population
2.9M
2,870,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is Chicago from Rome?

Chicago is about 7,740 km (4,810 mi) from Rome in a straight line — roughly 9 h 50 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
7,740 km
In miles
4,810 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
9 h 50 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is Chicago warmer than Rome?

Rome is the warmer city: January highs average 13°C vs -1°C, and July 31°C vs 29°C. Annual sunshine is comparable between the two.

Sunshine hours / year
Chicago
2,510
Rome
2,470
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
Chicago
1,010 mm
Rome
800 mm
MonthChicagoRome
January (high / low)-1° / -8°C13° / 4°C
July (high / low)29° / 19°C31° / 19°C
Chicago

Continental humid. Brutally cold snowy winters (wind chill off Lake Michigan), hot humid summers. The four-season classic.

Rome

Mediterranean. Hot, dry summers and mild winters — pleasant year-round but August heat regularly tops 35°C.

Analyst take

Rome edges Chicago by half a point, 5.6 to 5.1, suggesting marginal operational or livability differences rather than a decisive gap between the two cities.

Chicago's 5.1 score is competitive with major global cities; Rome's slight lead reflects specific advantages in heritage, walkability, or climate rather than fundamental superiority.

What to do

If choosing between them, prioritize your specific needs—Chicago for scale and economics, Rome for culture and lifestyle—since the scoring margin is too thin to recommend one universally.

Data signals

What separates Chicago and Rome

  • How decisive

    Rome comes out ahead by 0.5 composite points — a narrow edge.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is healthcare, where Rome leads by 2.9 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on quality of life — within 0.3 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in Rome run about 41% lower than in Chicago.

  • Where budgets split most

    Healthcare is the line item that diverges most: roughly 90% cheaper in Rome than Chicago.

  • Home internet

    Chicago has the faster typical broadband (250 vs 120 Mbps median) — worth weighing if you work remotely or move large files.

  • Safety

    Rome scores higher on safety (55 vs 45 / 100) — a common deciding factor for families.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
Chicago
2.5/10
Rome
3.4/10
Quality of life
Chicago
5.9/10
Rome
6.2/10
Remote-work friendliness
Chicago
6.8/10
Rome
4.7/10
Healthcare
Chicago
5.3/10
Rome
8.2/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisChicagoRomeWinner
Affordability2.53.4Rome +0.9
Quality of life5.96.2Rome +0.3
Remote-work friendliness6.84.7Chicago +2.1
Healthcare5.38.2Rome +2.9
Score card · Chicago
5.1/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

2.5poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)78
  • Rent index (weight 40%)70
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Chicago: ((100 − 78)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 70)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 2.5.

Chicago is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

5.9fair
  • Safety index (weight 40%)45
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)72
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)65
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Chicago: (45/100 × 0.4 + 72/100 × 0.35 + 65/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.9.

Chicago has a mixed quality profile. Safety: fair; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

6.8good
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)250 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)17.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)78
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Chicago: (min(250/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.17) × 0.3 + (100 − 78)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.8.

Chicago works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 250 Mbps, income tax 17%, cost index 78.

Healthcare

5.3fair
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)72
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)450
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Chicago: (72/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 450/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 5.3.

Chicago has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~450 USD/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.

Score card · Rome
5.6/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

3.4poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)75
  • Rent index (weight 40%)52
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Rome: ((100 − 75)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 52)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.4.

Rome is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.2good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)55
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)78
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)52
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Rome: (55/100 × 0.4 + 78/100 × 0.35 + 52/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.2.

Rome has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: fair. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

4.7fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)120 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)25.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)75
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Rome: (min(120/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.25) × 0.3 + (100 − 75)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.7.

Rome works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 120 Mbps, income tax 25%, cost index 75.

Healthcare

8.2excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)78
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)40
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Rome: (78/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 40/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.2.

Rome combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~40 EUR/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Monthly cost delta: Chicago vs Rome

Normalized to USD at 1 EUR = 1.0800 USD.

CategoryChicagoRomeChange
housing$2,200€1,300-36%
food$600€400-28%
transport$105€35-64%
utilities$230€170-20%
leisure$600€350-37%
healthcare$450€40-90%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

Chicago53% housing
Rome57% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is healthcare: Chicago spends 9.0 percentage points more of its budget on it (11% vs. 2%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: Chicago vs Rome

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central Chicago runs about 15% cheaper per square meter (€5,500/m² vs €6,500/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
Chicago
€5,500/m²
Rome
€6,500/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
Chicago
€3,800/m²
Rome
€4,500/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: Chicago vs Rome

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
Chicago
€100
Rome
€35
Chicago

CTA monthly pass; 'L' lines run 24/7 on the Red and Blue lines, useful for night-shift workers.

Single ride: €2.4 · Modes: Metro, Bus, Commuter rail

Rome

ATAC monthly pass; the metro has only 3 lines because Roman archaeology blocks expansion, so bus networks carry most of the load.

Day pass: €7 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail

Salary equivalence: Chicago ↔ Rome

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Chicago = 78, Rome = 75); currency-converted at 1 EUR = 1.0800 USD. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in Chicago, moving to Rome
USD → equivalent EUR
Chicago grossRome equivalent
$40,000€35,613
$75,000€66,774
$120,000€106,838
Earning in Rome, moving to Chicago
EUR → equivalent USD
Rome grossChicago equivalent
€40,000$44,928
€75,000$84,240
€120,000$134,784

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick Chicago

  • Wins on remote-work friendliness (+2.1 points vs Rome).

Why pick Rome

  • Wins on affordability (+0.9 points vs Chicago).
  • Wins on quality of life (+0.3 points vs Chicago).
  • Wins on healthcare (+2.9 points vs Chicago).

Chicago trade-offs

  • Trails Rome on affordability by 0.9 points.
  • Trails Rome on healthcare by 2.9 points.

Rome trade-offs

  • Trails Chicago on remote-work friendliness by 2.1 points.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: Chicago vs Rome

Chicago (America/Chicago) and Rome (Europe/Rome) sit 7 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 1 hour a day.

Chicago

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native, extremely multicultural. Spanish strong in Pilsen / Little Village; Polish heritage on the north side. English universal.

Rome

Official: Italian · English: Moderate · Local language: Recommended

Italian needed for daily-life bureaucracy. English in international firms and tourism but limited in most local services. Italian fluency materially helps the relocation experience.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Chicago by 0.6 points
Chicago4.7/10
Rome4.0/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
Rome by 1.6 points
Chicago5.6/10
Rome7.2/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Rome by 1.4 points
Chicago4.6/10
Rome5.9/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Rome by 0.9 points
Chicago2.5/10
Rome3.4/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Zoom out from cities to countries: compare United States vs Italy on average wage, take-home after tax and cost of living.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-28 (Chicago) and 2026-05-28 (Rome).
  • FX rate. 1 EUR = 1.0800 USD, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Chicago is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

Chicago vs Rome: which is cheaper?

Rome is roughly 41% cheaper than Chicago on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Chicago has cost index 78 vs Rome at 75 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

Chicago scores 5.1/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Rome at 5.6/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Rome wins overall by 0.5 points.

Is Chicago or Rome better for remote work?

Chicago has 250 Mbps median internet vs Rome at 120 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is Chicago bigger than Rome?

Chicago and Rome are similar in size — about 2.7M and 2.9M people respectively.

Is Chicago safer than Rome?

Rome scores higher on safety — 55 vs 45 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to Chicago or Rome?

It depends on what you weight. Rome wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.5 points, but Rome is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.