Mundevo
City comparison·United States flagChicagovsSweden flagStockholm

Chicago vs Stockholm: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between Chicago and Stockholm? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

Stockholm comes out ahead overall — by a narrow edge.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
Stockholm flagStockholm
Cheaper
Stockholm flagStockholm
Quality of life
Stockholm flagStockholm
Remote work
Chicago flagChicago

Composite scores

Overall: Stockholm wins by 0.2 points

Chicago composite
5.1 / 10
fair
Stockholm composite
5.3 / 10
fair

Population & size

Is Chicago bigger than Stockholm?

Chicago is the bigger city: about 2.7M people versus Stockholm's 975k — roughly 2.8× larger.

Chicago population
2.7M
2,700,000
Stockholm population
975k
975,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is Chicago from Stockholm?

Chicago is about 6,880 km (4,280 mi) from Stockholm in a straight line — roughly 8 h 50 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
6,880 km
In miles
4,280 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
8 h 50 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is Chicago warmer than Stockholm?

Chicago is the warmer city: January highs average -1°C vs -1°C, and July 29°C vs 22°C. Chicago gets noticeably more sun — about 690 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
Chicago
2,510
Stockholm
1,820
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
Chicago
1,010 mm
Stockholm
540 mm
MonthChicagoStockholm
January (high / low)-1° / -8°C-1° / -5°C
July (high / low)29° / 19°C22° / 13°C
Chicago

Continental humid. Brutally cold snowy winters (wind chill off Lake Michigan), hot humid summers. The four-season classic.

Stockholm

Cold dark winters (6h daylight in December), bright warm summers with very long days. Mood/seasonal effect is real — consider it.

Analyst take

Stockholm edges Chicago by 0.7 points (5.8 vs 5.1), suggesting measurably better conditions across the metrics being tracked here.

That 14% gap is meaningful but not decisive—both cities cluster in the mid-5s rather than approaching excellence or distress.

What to do

Dig into which specific categories drive Stockholm's advantage before deciding either city fits your priorities; overall scores mask important differences.

Data signals

What separates Chicago and Stockholm

  • How decisive

    Stockholm comes out ahead by 0.2 composite points — a narrow edge.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is healthcare, where Stockholm leads by 2.5 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on affordability — within 1.4 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in Stockholm run about 49% lower than in Chicago.

  • Where budgets split most

    Healthcare is the line item that diverges most: roughly 97% cheaper in Stockholm than Chicago.

  • Size difference

    Chicago is the larger metro — about 2.8× the population of the other, which shapes commute times, housing supply and how "big-city" daily life feels.

  • Home internet

    Chicago has the faster typical broadband (250 vs 150 Mbps median) — worth weighing if you work remotely or move large files.

  • Safety

    Stockholm scores higher on safety (70 vs 45 / 100) — a common deciding factor for families.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
Chicago
2.5/10
Stockholm
1.1/10
Quality of life
Chicago
5.9/10
Stockholm
7.7/10
Remote-work friendliness
Chicago
6.8/10
Stockholm
4.5/10
Healthcare
Chicago
5.3/10
Stockholm
7.8/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisChicagoStockholmWinner
Affordability2.51.1Chicago +1.4
Quality of life5.97.7Stockholm +1.8
Remote-work friendliness6.84.5Chicago +2.3
Healthcare5.37.8Stockholm +2.5
Score card · Chicago
5.1/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

2.5poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)78
  • Rent index (weight 40%)70
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Chicago: ((100 − 78)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 70)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 2.5.

Chicago is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

5.9fair
  • Safety index (weight 40%)45
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)72
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)65
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Chicago: (45/100 × 0.4 + 72/100 × 0.35 + 65/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.9.

Chicago has a mixed quality profile. Safety: fair; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

6.8good
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)250 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)17.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)78
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Chicago: (min(250/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.17) × 0.3 + (100 − 78)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.8.

Chicago works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 250 Mbps, income tax 17%, cost index 78.

Healthcare

5.3fair
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)72
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)450
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Chicago: (72/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 450/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 5.3.

Chicago has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~450 USD/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.

Score card · Stockholm
5.3/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

1.1poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)97
  • Rent index (weight 40%)77
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Stockholm: ((100 − 97)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 77)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 1.1.

Stockholm is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

7.7good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)70
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)82
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)80
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Stockholm: (70/100 × 0.4 + 82/100 × 0.35 + 80/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.7.

Stockholm scores good on safety, excellent on healthcare and excellent on air. The composite quality-of-life signal is strong.

Remote-work friendliness

4.5fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)150 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)28.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)97
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Stockholm: (min(150/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.28) × 0.3 + (100 − 97)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.5.

Stockholm works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 150 Mbps, income tax 28%, cost index 97.

Healthcare

7.8good
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)82
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)150
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Stockholm: (82/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 150/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 7.8.

Stockholm combines excellent system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~150 SEK/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Monthly cost delta: Chicago vs Stockholm

Normalized to USD at 1 SEK = 0.0947 USD.

CategoryChicagoStockholmChange
housing$2,200SEK 13,500-42%
food$600SEK 4,000-37%
transport$105SEK 970-12%
utilities$230SEK 1,100-55%
leisure$600SEK 3,000-53%
healthcare$450SEK 150-97%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

Chicago53% housing
Stockholm59% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is healthcare: Chicago spends 10.1 percentage points more of its budget on it (11% vs. 1%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: Chicago vs Stockholm

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central Chicago runs about 29% cheaper per square meter (€5,500/m² vs €7,800/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
Chicago
€5,500/m²
Stockholm
€7,800/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
Chicago
€3,800/m²
Stockholm
€5,500/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: Chicago vs Stockholm

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
Chicago
€100
Stockholm
€86
Chicago

CTA monthly pass; 'L' lines run 24/7 on the Red and Blue lines, useful for night-shift workers.

Single ride: €2.4 · Modes: Metro, Bus, Commuter rail

Stockholm

SL access card covers metro + commuter rail + bus + tram + the inner-archipelago ferries.

Day pass: €14 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry

Salary equivalence: Chicago ↔ Stockholm

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Chicago = 78, Stockholm = 97); currency-converted at 1 SEK = 0.0947 USD. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in Chicago, moving to Stockholm
USD → equivalent SEK
Chicago grossStockholm equivalent
$40,000SEK 525,071
$75,000SEK 984,509
$120,000SEK 1,575,214
Earning in Stockholm, moving to Chicago
SEK → equivalent USD
Stockholm grossChicago equivalent
SEK 40,000$3,047
SEK 75,000$5,714
SEK 120,000$9,142

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick Chicago

  • Wins on affordability (+1.4 points vs Stockholm).
  • Wins on remote-work friendliness (+2.3 points vs Stockholm).

Why pick Stockholm

  • Wins on quality of life (+1.8 points vs Chicago).
  • Wins on healthcare (+2.5 points vs Chicago).

Chicago trade-offs

  • Trails Stockholm on quality of life by 1.8 points.
  • Trails Stockholm on healthcare by 2.5 points.

Stockholm trade-offs

  • Trails Chicago on affordability by 1.4 points.
  • Trails Chicago on remote-work friendliness by 2.3 points.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: Chicago vs Stockholm

Chicago (America/Chicago) and Stockholm (Europe/Stockholm) sit 7 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 1 hour a day.

Chicago

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native, extremely multicultural. Spanish strong in Pilsen / Little Village; Polish heritage on the north side. English universal.

Stockholm

Official: Swedish · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

Among the most English-friendly cities globally. Swedish is helpful for long-term integration but daily life and most workplaces function fully in English.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Chicago by 1.9 points
Chicago4.7/10
Stockholm2.8/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
Stockholm by 2.2 points
Chicago5.6/10
Stockholm7.8/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Stockholm by 1.0 points
Chicago4.6/10
Stockholm5.5/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Chicago by 1.4 points
Chicago2.5/10
Stockholm1.1/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Zoom out from cities to countries: compare United States vs Sweden on average wage, take-home after tax and cost of living.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-28 (Chicago) and 2026-05-28 (Stockholm).
  • FX rate. 1 SEK = 0.0947 USD, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Chicago is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

Chicago vs Stockholm: which is cheaper?

Stockholm is roughly 49% cheaper than Chicago on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Chicago has cost index 78 vs Stockholm at 97 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

Chicago scores 5.1/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Stockholm at 5.3/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Stockholm wins overall by 0.2 points.

Is Chicago or Stockholm better for remote work?

Chicago has 250 Mbps median internet vs Stockholm at 150 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is Chicago bigger than Stockholm?

Chicago is larger — about 2.7M people versus Stockholm's 975k, roughly 2.8× the size.

Is Chicago safer than Stockholm?

Stockholm scores higher on safety — 70 vs 45 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to Chicago or Stockholm?

It depends on what you weight. Stockholm wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.2 points, but Stockholm is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.