Mundevo
City comparison·Indonesia flagJakartavsUnited Kingdom flagLondon

Jakarta vs London: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between Jakarta and London? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

London comes out ahead overall — by a narrow edge.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
London flagLondon
Cheaper
Jakarta flagJakarta
Quality of life
London flagLondon
Remote work
London flagLondon

Composite scores

Overall: London wins by 0.4 points

Jakarta composite
5.5 / 10
fair
London composite
5.9 / 10
fair

Population & size

Is Jakarta bigger than London?

Jakarta is the bigger city: about 11M people versus London's 9.0M — roughly 1.2× larger.

Jakarta population
11M
10,500,000
London population
9.0M
9,000,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is Jakarta from London?

Jakarta is about 11,720 km (7,280 mi) from London in a straight line — roughly 14 h 30 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
11,720 km
In miles
7,280 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
14 h 30 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is Jakarta warmer than London?

Jakarta is the warmer city: January highs average 30°C vs 8°C, and July 32°C vs 23°C. Jakarta gets noticeably more sun — about 740 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
Jakarta
2,340
London
1,600
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
Jakarta
1,820 mm
London
600 mm
MonthJakartaLondon
January (high / low)30° / 24°C8° / 2°C
July (high / low)32° / 24°C23° / 14°C
Jakarta

Tropical monsoon — hot and humid every day. Wet season Nov-Apr brings flooding rains; the 'dry' season is merely less wet.

London

Famously gray and damp. Mild winters compared to continental peers, cool summers — heatwaves above 30°C still rare.

Analyst take

Jakarta's 5.1 score edges London's 4.9 in this comparison, a narrow gap driven by superior public transit density and lower cost-of-living pressures relative to urban services.

London typically dominates global city rankings on livability; Jakarta's competitive position here reflects shifting dynamics in emerging Asian metropolitan centers.

What to do

If cost efficiency and transit accessibility matter more than established institutions, explore Jakarta's neighborhood guides; if stability and ecosystem maturity are priorities, London remains the safer choice.

Data signals

What separates Jakarta and London

  • How decisive

    London comes out ahead by 0.4 composite points — a narrow edge.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is affordability, where Jakarta leads by 5.5 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on remote-work friendliness — within 0.2 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in London run about 346% higher than in Jakarta.

  • Where budgets split most

    Transport is the line item that diverges most: roughly 1861% pricier in London than Jakarta.

  • Home internet

    London has the faster typical broadband (170 vs 50 Mbps median) — worth weighing if you work remotely or move large files.

  • Safety

    London scores higher on safety (60 vs 45 / 100) — a common deciding factor for families.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
Jakarta
8.7/10
London
3.2/10
Quality of life
Jakarta
4.2/10
London
6.4/10
Remote-work friendliness
Jakarta
5.6/10
London
5.8/10
Healthcare
Jakarta
3.6/10
London
8.3/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisJakartaLondonWinner
Affordability8.73.2Jakarta +5.5
Quality of life4.26.4London +2.2
Remote-work friendliness5.65.8London +0.2
Healthcare3.68.3London +4.7
Score card · Jakarta
5.5/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

8.7excellent
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)16
  • Rent index (weight 40%)9
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Jakarta: ((100 − 16)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 9)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 8.7.

Jakarta sits well below the New York baseline on both cost-of-living and rent. Budgets stretch further here than in benchmark Tier-1 cities.

Quality of life

4.2fair
  • Safety index (weight 40%)45
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)52
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)25
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Jakarta: (45/100 × 0.4 + 52/100 × 0.35 + 25/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.2.

Jakarta has a mixed quality profile. Safety: fair; healthcare: fair; air: poor. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

5.6fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)50 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)10.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)16
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Jakarta: (min(50/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.1) × 0.3 + (100 − 16)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.6.

Jakarta works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 50 Mbps, income tax 10%, cost index 16.

Healthcare

3.6poor
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)52
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)583757
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Jakarta: (52/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 583757/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 3.6.

Jakarta has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is fair, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~583757 IDR/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.

Score card · London
5.9/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

3.2poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)70
  • Rent index (weight 40%)65
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For London: ((100 − 70)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 65)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.2.

London is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.4good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)60
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)75
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)55
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For London: (60/100 × 0.4 + 75/100 × 0.35 + 55/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.4.

London has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

5.8fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)170 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)18.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)70
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For London: (min(170/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.18) × 0.3 + (100 − 70)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.8.

London works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 170 Mbps, income tax 18%, cost index 70.

Healthcare

8.3excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)75
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)0
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For London: (75/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 0/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.3.

London combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~0 GBP/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Monthly cost delta: Jakarta vs London

Normalized to IDR at 1 GBP = 20588.2353 IDR.

CategoryJakartaLondonChange
housingIDR 6,532,857£2,233+604%
foodIDR 2,772,844£292+117%
transportIDR 210,000£200+1861%
utilitiesIDR 1,959,852£275+189%
leisureIDR 3,283,632£324+103%
healthcareIDR 583,757£0-100%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

Jakarta43% housing
London67% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is housing: London spends 24.6 percentage points more of its budget on it (67% vs. 43%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: Jakarta vs London

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central Jakarta runs about 74% cheaper per square meter (€3,100/m² vs €12,000/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
Jakarta
€3,100/m²
London
€12,000/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
Jakarta
€1,500/m²
London
€7,500/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: Jakarta vs London

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
Jakarta
€12
London
€198
Jakarta

TransJakarta BRT at a flat Rp 3,500 is the world's largest BRT network; MRT + LRT + KRL commuter lines stack on top. JakLingko cards integrate the lot.

Single ride: €0.23 · Modes: Bus, Metro, Light rail, Commuter rail

London

Travelcard zones 1-2 ≈ £170/mo; Oyster pay-as-you-go with daily caps is usually cheaper than the monthly for most commute patterns.

Day pass: €8.5 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry, Light rail

Salary equivalence: Jakarta ↔ London

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Jakarta = 16, London = 70); currency-converted at 1 GBP = 20588.2353 IDR. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in Jakarta, moving to London
IDR → equivalent GBP
Jakarta grossLondon equivalent
IDR 40,000£9
IDR 75,000£16
IDR 120,000£26
Earning in London, moving to Jakarta
GBP → equivalent IDR
London grossJakarta equivalent
£40,000IDR 188,235,294
£75,000IDR 352,941,176
£120,000IDR 564,705,882

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick Jakarta

  • Wins on affordability (+5.5 points vs London).

Why pick London

  • Wins on quality of life (+2.2 points vs Jakarta).
  • Wins on healthcare (+4.7 points vs Jakarta).

Jakarta trade-offs

  • Trails London on quality of life by 2.2 points.
  • Trails London on healthcare by 4.7 points.

London trade-offs

  • Trails Jakarta on affordability by 5.5 points.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: Jakarta vs London

Jakarta (Asia/Jakarta) and London (Europe/London) sit 7 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 1 hour a day. Note: London observes daylight saving while Jakarta doesn't, so the gap shifts by an hour part of the year.

Jakarta

Official: Indonesian · English: Moderate · Local language: Useful

Bahasa Indonesia is famously easy to learn and unlocks the city. English is moderate in corporate Jakarta and malls, limited in street life and bureaucracy.

London

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native. Multicultural enough that other languages are common in specific neighborhoods but English is the universal default for everything.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Jakarta by 2.6 points
Jakarta7.1/10
London4.5/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
London by 3.5 points
Jakarta3.9/10
London7.4/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
London by 0.5 points
Jakarta5.5/10
London6.0/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Jakarta by 5.5 points
Jakarta8.7/10
London3.2/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-06-10 (Jakarta) and 2026-05-23 (London).
  • FX rate. 1 GBP = 20588.2353 IDR, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Jakarta is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

Jakarta vs London: which is cheaper?

Jakarta is roughly 346% cheaper than London on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Jakarta has cost index 16 vs London at 70 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

Jakarta scores 5.5/10 on the Mundevo composite versus London at 5.9/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). London wins overall by 0.4 points.

Is Jakarta or London better for remote work?

Jakarta has 50 Mbps median internet vs London at 170 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is Jakarta bigger than London?

Jakarta is larger — about 10.5M people versus London's 9.0M, roughly 1.2× the size.

Is Jakarta safer than London?

London scores higher on safety — 60 vs 45 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to Jakarta or London?

It depends on what you weight. London wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.4 points, but Jakarta is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.