Mundevo
City comparison·Saudi Arabia flagJeddahvsJapan flagOsaka

Jeddah vs Osaka: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between Jeddah and Osaka? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

Jeddah comes out ahead overall — by a narrow edge.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
Jeddah flagJeddah
Cheaper
Osaka flagOsaka
Quality of life
Osaka flagOsaka
Remote work
Osaka flagOsaka

Composite scores

Overall: Jeddah wins by 0.3 points

Jeddah composite
6.2 / 10
good
Osaka composite
5.9 / 10
fair

Population & size

Is Jeddah bigger than Osaka?

Jeddah is the bigger city: about 4.7M people versus Osaka's 2.7M — roughly 1.7× larger.

Jeddah population
4.7M
4,700,000
Osaka population
2.7M
2,700,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is Jeddah from Osaka?

Jeddah is about 9,210 km (5,720 mi) from Osaka in a straight line — roughly 11 h 35 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
9,210 km
In miles
5,720 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
11 h 35 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is Jeddah warmer than Osaka?

Jeddah is the warmer city: January highs average 29°C vs 9°C, and July 39°C vs 32°C. Jeddah gets noticeably more sun — about 1,180 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
Jeddah
3,230
Osaka
2,050
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
Jeddah
55 mm
Osaka
1,300 mm
MonthJeddahOsaka
January (high / low)29° / 19°C9° / 2°C
July (high / low)39° / 28°C32° / 24°C
Jeddah

Hot desert on the Red Sea — hot all year, extreme summer humidity along the corniche. Winter is warm rather than mild; rain is a rare event.

Osaka

Humid subtropical, similar to Tokyo. Hot wet summers, mild dry winters; rainy season (tsuyu) Jun-Jul; typhoon risk Sep-Oct.

Analyst take

Jeddah edges out Osaka on the Mundevo composite, 6.2 to 5.9 out of 10 — a narrow 0.3-point margin across safety, healthcare, air quality and cost.

The composite gap is small enough that one weighted axis can flip the result. Use the per-axis breakdown below to see which city wins your specific priorities — someone optimizing for healthcare can land on a different answer than someone optimizing for affordability.

What to do

Run the salary calculator for both cities at your target lifestyle before deciding — Jeddah winning on quality doesn't mean the gross-salary requirement also lands in your favor. If you're on a balanced tier, the cost-of-living pages for each city carry the full monthly basket and the gross-salary figure.

Data signals

What separates Jeddah and Osaka

  • How decisive

    Jeddah comes out ahead by 0.3 composite points — a narrow edge.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is affordability, where Jeddah leads by 2.4 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on remote-work friendliness — within 0.1 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in Osaka run about 46% lower than in Jeddah.

  • Where budgets split most

    Healthcare is the line item that diverges most: roughly 79% cheaper in Osaka than Jeddah.

  • Size difference

    Jeddah is the larger metro — about 1.7× the population of the other, which shapes commute times, housing supply and how "big-city" daily life feels.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
Jeddah
6.2/10
Osaka
3.8/10
Quality of life
Jeddah
6.5/10
Osaka
7.4/10
Remote-work friendliness
Jeddah
7.0/10
Osaka
7.1/10
Healthcare
Jeddah
5.2/10
Osaka
5.5/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisJeddahOsakaWinner
Affordability6.23.8Jeddah +2.4
Quality of life6.57.4Osaka +0.9
Remote-work friendliness7.07.1Osaka +0.1
Healthcare5.25.5Osaka +0.3
Score card · Jeddah
6.2/ 10 compositegood

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

6.2good
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)48
  • Rent index (weight 40%)24
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Jeddah: ((100 − 48)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 24)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 6.2.

Jeddah is mid-range on absolute cost. Affordability is reasonable but not its main advantage.

Quality of life

6.5good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)74
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)66
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)48
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Jeddah: (74/100 × 0.4 + 66/100 × 0.35 + 48/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.5.

Jeddah has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: fair. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

7.0good
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)180 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)0.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)48
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Jeddah: (min(180/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0) × 0.3 + (100 − 48)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.

Jeddah combines fast internet (180 Mbps median), a 0% effective income tax and cost index 48 — a strong configuration for remote workers earning in a stronger currency.

Healthcare

5.2fair
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)66
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)400
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Jeddah: (66/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 400/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 5.2.

Jeddah has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~400 SAR/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.

Score card · Osaka
5.9/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

3.8poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)70
  • Rent index (weight 40%)50
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Osaka: ((100 − 70)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 50)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.8.

Osaka is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

7.4good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)80
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)78
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)60
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Osaka: (80/100 × 0.4 + 78/100 × 0.35 + 60/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.4.

Osaka scores excellent on safety, good on healthcare and good on air. The composite quality-of-life signal is strong.

Remote-work friendliness

7.1good
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)250 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)12.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)70
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Osaka: (min(250/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.12) × 0.3 + (100 − 70)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.1.

Osaka combines fast internet (250 Mbps median), a 12% effective income tax and cost index 70 — a strong configuration for remote workers earning in a stronger currency.

Healthcare

5.5fair
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)78
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)3500
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Osaka: (78/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 3500/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 5.5.

Osaka has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~3500 JPY/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.

Monthly cost delta: Jeddah vs Osaka

Normalized to SAR at 1 JPY = 0.0241 SAR.

CategoryJeddahOsakaChange
housingSAR 3,500¥100,000-31%
foodSAR 1,700¥42,000-40%
transportSAR 180¥9,000+21%
utilitiesSAR 550¥13,000-43%
leisureSAR 2,200¥25,000-73%
healthcareSAR 400¥3,500-79%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

Jeddah41% housing
Osaka52% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is leisure: Jeddah spends 12.8 percentage points more of its budget on it (26% vs. 13%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: Jeddah vs Osaka

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central Jeddah runs about 80% cheaper per square meter (€1,500/m² vs €7,500/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
Jeddah
€1,500/m²
Osaka
€7,500/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
Jeddah
€900/m²
Osaka
€5,000/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: Jeddah vs Osaka

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
Jeddah
€50.7
Osaka
€55
Jeddah

SAPTCO/Jeddah Buses network is young and sparse — e-hailing (Careem/Uber) remains the practical default for most trips.

Single ride: €0.85 · Modes: Bus

Osaka

Osaka Metro Tetsu-Buse 1-day pass shown; Suica/Pasmo IC card works regionally as in Tokyo.

Day pass: €6 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail

Salary equivalence: Jeddah ↔ Osaka

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Jeddah = 48, Osaka = 70); currency-converted at 1 JPY = 0.0241 SAR. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in Jeddah, moving to Osaka
SAR → equivalent JPY
Jeddah grossOsaka equivalent
SAR 40,000¥2,419,753
SAR 75,000¥4,537,037
SAR 120,000¥7,259,259
Earning in Osaka, moving to Jeddah
JPY → equivalent SAR
Osaka grossJeddah equivalent
¥40,000SAR 661
¥75,000SAR 1,240
¥120,000SAR 1,984

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick Jeddah

  • Wins on affordability (+2.4 points vs Osaka).

Why pick Osaka

  • Wins on quality of life (+0.9 points vs Jeddah).
  • Wins on healthcare (+0.3 points vs Jeddah).

Jeddah trade-offs

  • Trails Osaka on quality of life by 0.9 points.

Osaka trade-offs

  • Trails Jeddah on affordability by 2.4 points.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: Jeddah vs Osaka

Jeddah (Asia/Riyadh) and Osaka (Asia/Tokyo) sit 6 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 2 hours a day.

Jeddah

Official: Arabic · English: High · Local language: Helpful

The most cosmopolitan Saudi city — English widely usable in business and daily services; Arabic needed for government interactions.

Osaka

Official: Japanese · English: Limited · Local language: Recommended

Japanese strongly recommended even more than Tokyo — international corporate cohort is smaller. Osaka-ben (regional dialect) colors local speech; standard Japanese is fine.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Jeddah by 1.2 points
Jeddah6.6/10
Osaka5.4/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
Osaka by 0.6 points
Jeddah5.8/10
Osaka6.5/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Jeddah by 0.4 points
Jeddah6.0/10
Osaka5.6/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Jeddah by 2.4 points
Jeddah6.2/10
Osaka3.8/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-06-10 (Jeddah) and 2026-05-28 (Osaka).
  • FX rate. 1 JPY = 0.0241 SAR, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Jeddah is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

Jeddah vs Osaka: which is cheaper?

Osaka is roughly 46% cheaper than Jeddah on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Jeddah has cost index 48 vs Osaka at 70 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

Jeddah scores 6.2/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Osaka at 5.9/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Jeddah wins overall by 0.3 points.

Is Jeddah or Osaka better for remote work?

Jeddah has 180 Mbps median internet vs Osaka at 250 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is Jeddah bigger than Osaka?

Jeddah is larger — about 4.7M people versus Osaka's 2.7M, roughly 1.7× the size.

Is Jeddah safer than Osaka?

Osaka scores higher on safety — 80 vs 74 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to Jeddah or Osaka?

It depends on what you weight. Jeddah wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.3 points, but Osaka is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.