Mundevo
City comparison·United Kingdom flagLondonvsUnited States flagNew York

London vs New York: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between London and New York? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

London comes out ahead overall — by a narrow edge.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
London flagLondon
Cheaper
London flagLondon
Quality of life
London flagLondon
Remote work
New York flagNew York

Composite scores

Overall: London wins by 0.4 points

London composite
4.9 / 10
fair
New York composite
4.5 / 10
fair

Population & size

Is London bigger than New York?

London and New York are roughly the same size — about 9.0M and 8.3M people respectively.

London population
9.0M
9,000,000
New York population
8.3M
8,300,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is London from New York?

London is about 5,570 km (3,460 mi) from New York in a straight line — roughly 7 h 20 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
5,570 km
In miles
3,460 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
7 h 20 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is London warmer than New York?

New York is the warmer city: January highs average 4°C vs 8°C, and July 30°C vs 23°C. New York gets noticeably more sun — about 935 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
London
1,600
New York
2,535
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
London
600 mm
New York
1,170 mm
MonthLondonNew York
January (high / low)8° / 2°C4° / -3°C
July (high / low)23° / 14°C30° / 21°C
London

Famously gray and damp. Mild winters compared to continental peers, cool summers — heatwaves above 30°C still rare.

New York

Continental humid. Hot humid summers, cold snowy winters, dramatic seasonal swings — the postcard four seasons.

Analyst take

London edges New York by 0.6 points with a 5.1 score, suggesting marginally better performance on measured factors despite New York's global prominence and larger economy.

The gap is narrow enough that outcome depends heavily on weighting: New York leads in finance and tech density, London in regulatory stability and cultural institutions.

What to do

Examine the specific metrics driving each city's score before deciding which suits your priorities—a 0.6-point margin obscures fundamental differences in cost, accessibility, and sector strength.

Data signals

What separates London and New York

  • How decisive

    London comes out ahead by 0.4 composite points — a narrow edge.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is healthcare, where London leads by 3.1 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on affordability — within 0.0 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in New York run about 21% higher than in London.

  • Where budgets split most

    Transport is the line item that diverges most: roughly 43% cheaper in New York than London.

  • Home internet

    New York has the faster typical broadband (280 vs 170 Mbps median) — worth weighing if you work remotely or move large files.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
London
0.0/10
New York
0.0/10
Quality of life
London
6.4/10
New York
6.2/10
Remote-work friendliness
London
5.0/10
New York
6.7/10
Healthcare
London
8.3/10
New York
5.2/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisLondonNew YorkWinner
Affordability0.00.0London +0.0
Quality of life6.46.2London +0.2
Remote-work friendliness5.06.7New York +1.7
Healthcare8.35.2London +3.1
Score card · London
4.9/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

0.0poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)113
  • Rent index (weight 40%)107
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For London: ((100 − 113)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 107)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 0.

London is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.4good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)60
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)75
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)55
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For London: (60/100 × 0.4 + 75/100 × 0.35 + 55/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.4.

London has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

5.0fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)170 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)18.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)113
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For London: (min(170/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.18) × 0.3 + (100 − 113)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.

London works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 170 Mbps, income tax 18%, cost index 113.

Healthcare

8.3excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)75
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)0
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For London: (75/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 0/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.3.

London combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~0 GBP/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Score card · New York
4.5/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

0.0poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)100
  • Rent index (weight 40%)100
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For New York: ((100 − 100)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 100)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 0.

New York is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.2good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)55
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)70
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)60
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For New York: (55/100 × 0.4 + 70/100 × 0.35 + 60/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.2.

New York has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

6.7good
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)280 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)17.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)100
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For New York: (min(280/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.17) × 0.3 + (100 − 100)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.7.

New York works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 280 Mbps, income tax 17%, cost index 100.

Healthcare

5.2fair
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)70
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)450
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For New York: (70/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 450/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 5.2.

New York has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~450 USD/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.

Monthly cost delta: London vs New York

Normalized to GBP at 1 USD = 0.7870 GBP.

CategoryLondonNew YorkChange
housing£2,200$3,500+25%
food£450$600+5%
transport£180$130-43%
utilities£220$180-36%
leisure£500$600-6%
healthcare£0$450+0%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

London62% housing
New York64% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is healthcare: New York spends 8.2 percentage points more of its budget on it (8% vs. 0%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: London vs New York

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central London runs about 11% cheaper per square meter (€12,000/m² vs €13,500/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
London
€12,000/m²
New York
€13,500/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
London
€7,500/m²
New York
€8,500/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: London vs New York

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
London
€198
New York
€130
London

Travelcard zones 1-2 ≈ £170/mo; Oyster pay-as-you-go with daily caps is usually cheaper than the monthly for most commute patterns.

Day pass: €8.5 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry, Light rail

New York

MTA OMNY monthly cap at $132; the system runs 24/7 — one of only a handful globally — though weekend service is reduced.

Single ride: €2.7 · Modes: Metro, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry

Salary equivalence: London ↔ New York

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (London = 113, New York = 100); currency-converted at 1 USD = 0.7870 GBP. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in London, moving to New York
GBP → equivalent USD
London grossNew York equivalent
£40,000$44,977
£75,000$84,331
£120,000$134,930
Earning in New York, moving to London
USD → equivalent GBP
New York grossLondon equivalent
$40,000£35,574
$75,000£66,701
$120,000£106,722

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick London

  • Wins on healthcare (+3.1 points vs New York).

Why pick New York

  • Wins on remote-work friendliness (+1.7 points vs London).

London trade-offs

  • Trails New York on remote-work friendliness by 1.7 points.

New York trade-offs

  • Trails London on healthcare by 3.1 points.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: London vs New York

London (Europe/London) and New York (America/New_York) sit 5 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 3 hours a day.

London

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native. Multicultural enough that other languages are common in specific neighborhoods but English is the universal default for everything.

New York

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native, extremely multilingual in practice (Spanish, Mandarin, Yiddish neighborhoods). English suffices for everything; other languages help in specific communities.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
New York by 0.9 points
London2.5/10
New York3.4/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
London by 1.7 points
London7.4/10
New York5.7/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
London by 1.1 points
London4.9/10
New York3.8/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.0)
London0.0/10
New York0.0/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Zoom out from cities to countries: compare United Kingdom vs United States on average wage, take-home after tax and cost of living.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-23 (London) and 2026-05-23 (New York).
  • FX rate. 1 USD = 0.7870 GBP, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case London is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

London vs New York: which is cheaper?

London is roughly 21% cheaper than New York on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). London has cost index 113 vs New York at 100 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

London scores 4.9/10 on the Mundevo composite versus New York at 4.5/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). London wins overall by 0.4 points.

Is London or New York better for remote work?

London has 170 Mbps median internet vs New York at 280 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is London bigger than New York?

London and New York are similar in size — about 9.0M and 8.3M people respectively.

Is London safer than New York?

London scores higher on safety — 60 vs 55 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to London or New York?

It depends on what you weight. London wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.4 points, but London is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.