Mundevo
City comparison·United Kingdom flagLondonvsItaly flagRome

London vs Rome: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between London and Rome? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

Rome comes out ahead overall — by a clear margin.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
Rome flagRome
Cheaper
Rome flagRome
Quality of life
London flagLondon
Remote work
London flagLondon

Composite scores

Overall: Rome wins by 0.7 points

London composite
4.9 / 10
fair
Rome composite
5.6 / 10
fair

Population & size

Is London bigger than Rome?

London is the bigger city: about 9.0M people versus Rome's 2.9M — roughly 3.1× larger.

London population
9.0M
9,000,000
Rome population
2.9M
2,870,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is London from Rome?

London is about 1,430 km (890 mi) from Rome in a straight line — roughly 2 h 25 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
1,430 km
In miles
890 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
2 h 25 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is London warmer than Rome?

Rome is the warmer city: January highs average 13°C vs 8°C, and July 31°C vs 23°C. Rome gets noticeably more sun — about 870 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
London
1,600
Rome
2,470
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
London
600 mm
Rome
800 mm
MonthLondonRome
January (high / low)8° / 2°C13° / 4°C
July (high / low)23° / 14°C31° / 19°C
London

Famously gray and damp. Mild winters compared to continental peers, cool summers — heatwaves above 30°C still rare.

Rome

Mediterranean. Hot, dry summers and mild winters — pleasant year-round but August heat regularly tops 35°C.

Analyst take

Rome edges London by 0.5 points (5.6 vs 5.1), a narrow gap that suggests both cities excel in different dimensions rather than one being broadly superior.

London typically dominates on economic metrics while Rome's strength lies in cultural density and walkability, making direct ranking less meaningful than attribute comparison.

What to do

Dig into the scoring methodology to see which specific factors drove Rome's win—your choice between them should hinge on what matters most to your priorities, not the headline score.

Data signals

What separates London and Rome

  • How decisive

    Rome comes out ahead by 0.7 composite points — a clear edge.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is affordability, where Rome leads by 3.4 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on healthcare — within 0.1 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in Rome run about 45% lower than in London.

  • Where budgets split most

    Transport is the line item that diverges most: roughly 83% cheaper in Rome than London.

  • Size difference

    London is the larger metro — about 3.1× the population of the other, which shapes commute times, housing supply and how "big-city" daily life feels.

  • Home internet

    London has the faster typical broadband (170 vs 120 Mbps median) — worth weighing if you work remotely or move large files.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
London
0.0/10
Rome
3.4/10
Quality of life
London
6.4/10
Rome
6.2/10
Remote-work friendliness
London
5.0/10
Rome
4.7/10
Healthcare
London
8.3/10
Rome
8.2/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisLondonRomeWinner
Affordability0.03.4Rome +3.4
Quality of life6.46.2London +0.2
Remote-work friendliness5.04.7London +0.3
Healthcare8.38.2London +0.1
Score card · London
4.9/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

0.0poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)113
  • Rent index (weight 40%)107
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For London: ((100 − 113)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 107)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 0.

London is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.4good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)60
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)75
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)55
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For London: (60/100 × 0.4 + 75/100 × 0.35 + 55/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.4.

London has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

5.0fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)170 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)18.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)113
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For London: (min(170/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.18) × 0.3 + (100 − 113)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.

London works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 170 Mbps, income tax 18%, cost index 113.

Healthcare

8.3excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)75
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)0
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For London: (75/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 0/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.3.

London combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~0 GBP/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Score card · Rome
5.6/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

3.4poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)75
  • Rent index (weight 40%)52
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Rome: ((100 − 75)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 52)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.4.

Rome is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.2good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)55
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)78
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)52
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Rome: (55/100 × 0.4 + 78/100 × 0.35 + 52/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.2.

Rome has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: fair. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

4.7fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)120 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)25.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)75
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Rome: (min(120/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.25) × 0.3 + (100 − 75)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.7.

Rome works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 120 Mbps, income tax 25%, cost index 75.

Healthcare

8.2excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)78
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)40
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Rome: (78/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 40/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.2.

Rome combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~40 EUR/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Monthly cost delta: London vs Rome

Normalized to GBP at 1 EUR = 0.8500 GBP.

CategoryLondonRomeChange
housing£2,200€1,300-50%
food£450€400-24%
transport£180€35-83%
utilities£220€170-34%
leisure£500€350-41%
healthcare£0€40+0%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

London62% housing
Rome57% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is housing: London spends 5.3 percentage points more of its budget on it (62% vs. 57%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: London vs Rome

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central Rome runs about 46% cheaper per square meter (€6,500/m² vs €12,000/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
London
€12,000/m²
Rome
€6,500/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
London
€7,500/m²
Rome
€4,500/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: London vs Rome

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
London
€198
Rome
€35
London

Travelcard zones 1-2 ≈ £170/mo; Oyster pay-as-you-go with daily caps is usually cheaper than the monthly for most commute patterns.

Day pass: €8.5 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry, Light rail

Rome

ATAC monthly pass; the metro has only 3 lines because Roman archaeology blocks expansion, so bus networks carry most of the load.

Day pass: €7 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail

Salary equivalence: London ↔ Rome

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (London = 113, Rome = 75); currency-converted at 1 EUR = 0.8500 GBP. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in London, moving to Rome
GBP → equivalent EUR
London grossRome equivalent
£40,000€31,234
£75,000€58,563
£120,000€93,701
Earning in Rome, moving to London
EUR → equivalent GBP
Rome grossLondon equivalent
€40,000£51,227
€75,000£96,050
€120,000£153,680

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick London

  • Wins on remote-work friendliness (+0.3 points vs Rome).

Why pick Rome

  • Wins on affordability (+3.4 points vs London).

London trade-offs

  • Trails Rome on affordability by 3.4 points.

Rome trade-offs

No material trade-offs versus London on the scored axes.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: London vs Rome

London (Europe/London) and Rome (Europe/Rome) sit 1 hour apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 7 hours a day.

London

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native. Multicultural enough that other languages are common in specific neighborhoods but English is the universal default for everything.

Rome

Official: Italian · English: Moderate · Local language: Recommended

Italian needed for daily-life bureaucracy. English in international firms and tourism but limited in most local services. Italian fluency materially helps the relocation experience.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Rome by 1.5 points
London2.5/10
Rome4.0/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.2)
London7.4/10
Rome7.2/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Rome by 1.0 points
London4.9/10
Rome5.9/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Rome by 3.4 points
London0.0/10
Rome3.4/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Zoom out from cities to countries: compare United Kingdom vs Italy on average wage, take-home after tax and cost of living.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-23 (London) and 2026-05-28 (Rome).
  • FX rate. 1 EUR = 0.8500 GBP, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case London is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

London vs Rome: which is cheaper?

Rome is roughly 45% cheaper than London on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). London has cost index 113 vs Rome at 75 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

London scores 4.9/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Rome at 5.6/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Rome wins overall by 0.7 points.

Is London or Rome better for remote work?

London has 170 Mbps median internet vs Rome at 120 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is London bigger than Rome?

London is larger — about 9.0M people versus Rome's 2.9M, roughly 3.1× the size.

Is London safer than Rome?

London scores higher on safety — 60 vs 55 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to London or Rome?

It depends on what you weight. Rome wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.7 points, but Rome is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.