Mundevo
City comparison·Canada flagMontrealvsSweden flagStockholm

Montreal vs Stockholm: cost, quality of life, and the winner

Montreal (composite 6.1) vs Stockholm (composite 5.8). Side-by-side on affordability, quality of life, remote-work friendliness and healthcare — with the calculation behind each score.

Composite scores

Overall: Montreal wins by 0.3 points

Montreal composite
6.1 / 10
good
Stockholm composite
5.8 / 10
fair
Analyst take

Montreal edges Stockholm by 0.3 points (6.1 vs 5.8), a margin small enough to suggest these cities operate in the same competitive tier rather than one clearly outpacing the other.

Both cities score in the mid-range, placing them closer to each other than either is to top-tier performers, making direct comparison more meaningful than looking at absolute scores.

What to do

If choosing between them, examine the specific criteria driving that 0.3-point gap rather than treating Montreal as categorically superior—the difference likely reflects narrow strengths in particular dimensions.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

AxisMontrealStockholmWinner
Affordability3.52.8Montreal +0.7
Quality of life7.27.7Stockholm +0.5
Remote-work friendliness5.85.0Montreal +0.8
Healthcare7.87.8Montreal +0.0
Score card · Montreal
6.1/ 10 compositegood

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

3.5poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)68
  • Rent index (weight 40%)60
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Montreal: ((100 − 68)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 60)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.5.

Montreal is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

7.2good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)70
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)75
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)72
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Montreal: (70/100 × 0.4 + 75/100 × 0.35 + 72/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.2.

Montreal scores good on safety, good on healthcare and good on air. The composite quality-of-life signal is strong.

Remote-work friendliness

5.8fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)180 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)22.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)68
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Montreal: (min(180/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.22) × 0.3 + (100 − 68)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.8.

Montreal works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 180 Mbps, income tax 22%, cost index 68.

Healthcare

7.8good
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)75
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)70
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Montreal: (75/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 70/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 7.8.

Montreal combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~70 CAD/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Score card · Stockholm
5.8/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

2.8poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)78
  • Rent index (weight 40%)62
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Stockholm: ((100 − 78)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 62)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 2.8.

Stockholm is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

7.7good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)70
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)82
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)80
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Stockholm: (70/100 × 0.4 + 82/100 × 0.35 + 80/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.7.

Stockholm scores good on safety, excellent on healthcare and excellent on air. The composite quality-of-life signal is strong.

Remote-work friendliness

5.0fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)150 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)28.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)78
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Stockholm: (min(150/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.28) × 0.3 + (100 − 78)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.

Stockholm works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 150 Mbps, income tax 28%, cost index 78.

Healthcare

7.8good
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)82
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)150
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Stockholm: (82/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 150/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 7.8.

Stockholm combines excellent system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~150 SEK/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Monthly cost delta: Montreal vs Stockholm

Normalized to CAD at 1 SEK = 0.1289 CAD.

CategoryMontrealStockholmChange
housingCA$1,700SEK 13,500+2%
foodCA$550SEK 4,000-6%
transportCA$100SEK 970+25%
utilitiesCA$150SEK 1,100-5%
leisureCA$350SEK 3,000+11%
healthcareCA$70SEK 150-72%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

Montreal58% housing
Stockholm59% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

Salary equivalence: Montreal ↔ Stockholm

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Montreal = 68, Stockholm = 78); currency-converted at 1 SEK = 0.1289 CAD. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in Montreal, moving to Stockholm
CAD → equivalent SEK
Montreal grossStockholm equivalent
CA$40,000SEK 355,822
CA$75,000SEK 667,167
CA$120,000SEK 1,067,467
Earning in Stockholm, moving to Montreal
SEK → equivalent CAD
Stockholm grossMontreal equivalent
SEK 40,000CA$4,497
SEK 75,000CA$8,431
SEK 120,000CA$13,490

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick Montreal

  • Wins on affordability (+0.7 points vs Stockholm).
  • Wins on remote-work friendliness (+0.8 points vs Stockholm).

Why pick Stockholm

  • Wins on quality of life (+0.5 points vs Montreal).

Montreal trade-offs

  • Trails Stockholm on quality of life by 0.5 points.

Stockholm trade-offs

  • Trails Montreal on affordability by 0.7 points.
  • Trails Montreal on remote-work friendliness by 0.8 points.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Montreal by 0.8 points
Montreal4.7/10
Stockholm3.9/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
Stockholm by 0.3 points
Montreal7.5/10
Stockholm7.8/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.1)
Montreal6.2/10
Stockholm6.1/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Montreal by 0.7 points
Montreal3.5/10
Stockholm2.8/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Going deeper

Visa landscape for both countries — and case studies that touch this corridor.

Tools that work for either choice

Some links below are affiliate links — if you sign up we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-28 (Montreal) and 2026-05-28 (Stockholm).
  • FX rate. 1 SEK = 0.1289 CAD, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Montreal is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

Montreal vs Stockholm: which is cheaper?

Montreal is roughly 0% cheaper than Stockholm on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Montreal has cost index 68 vs Stockholm at 78 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

Montreal scores 6.1/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Stockholm at 5.8/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Montreal wins overall by 0.3 points.

Is Montreal or Stockholm better for remote work?

Montreal has 180 Mbps median internet vs Stockholm at 150 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

People also explore