Mundevo
City comparison·United States flagNew YorkvsUnited States flagSan Francisco

New York vs San Francisco: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between New York and San Francisco? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

New York and San Francisco are almost dead even overall.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
New York flagNew York
Cheaper
New York flagNew York
Quality of life
New York flagNew York
Remote work
New York flagNew York

Composite scores

Overall: New York wins by 0.1 points

New York composite
4.5 / 10
fair
San Francisco composite
4.4 / 10
fair

Population & size

Is New York bigger than San Francisco?

New York is the bigger city: about 8.3M people versus San Francisco's 873k — roughly 9.5× larger.

New York population
8.3M
8,300,000
San Francisco population
873k
873,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is New York from San Francisco?

New York is about 4,130 km (2,570 mi) from San Francisco in a straight line — roughly 5 h 35 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
4,130 km
In miles
2,570 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
5 h 35 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is New York warmer than San Francisco?

New York and San Francisco have broadly similar temperatures across the year. San Francisco gets noticeably more sun — about 425 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
New York
2,535
San Francisco
2,960
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
New York
1,170 mm
San Francisco
600 mm
MonthNew YorkSan Francisco
January (high / low)4° / -3°C14° / 8°C
July (high / low)30° / 21°C21° / 13°C
New York

Continental humid. Hot humid summers, cold snowy winters, dramatic seasonal swings — the postcard four seasons.

San Francisco

Famously mild and foggy. Almost no extremes — summers are cool (rarely above 25°C), winters mild and wet. Microclimates within the city vary wildly.

Analyst take

New York edges out San Francisco by just 0.1 points, suggesting these cities compete at nearly identical quality levels rather than one definitively outperforming the other.

Both cities score above 4.4, placing them in elite territory where the gap between them is narrower than typical variation within either city's neighborhoods.

What to do

Don't let the marginal difference decide your move; compare specific factors like cost, industry focus, or lifestyle alignment instead—the 0.1 spread masks crucial differences for your situation.

Data signals

What separates New York and San Francisco

  • How decisive

    New York comes out ahead by 0.1 composite points — essentially a tie.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is quality of life, where New York leads by 0.2 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on remote-work friendliness — within 0.0 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in San Francisco run about 4% higher than in New York.

  • Where budgets split most

    Transport is the line item that diverges most: roughly 38% cheaper in San Francisco than New York.

  • Size difference

    New York is the larger metro — about 9.5× the population of the other, which shapes commute times, housing supply and how "big-city" daily life feels.

  • Safety

    New York scores higher on safety (55 vs 45 / 100) — a common deciding factor for families.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
New York
0.0/10
San Francisco
0.0/10
Quality of life
New York
6.2/10
San Francisco
6.0/10
Remote-work friendliness
New York
6.7/10
San Francisco
6.7/10
Healthcare
New York
5.2/10
San Francisco
5.0/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisNew YorkSan FranciscoWinner
Affordability0.00.0New York +0.0
Quality of life6.26.0New York +0.2
Remote-work friendliness6.76.7New York +0.0
Healthcare5.25.0New York +0.2
Score card · New York
4.5/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

0.0poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)100
  • Rent index (weight 40%)100
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For New York: ((100 − 100)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 100)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 0.

New York is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.2good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)55
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)70
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)60
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For New York: (55/100 × 0.4 + 70/100 × 0.35 + 60/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.2.

New York has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

6.7good
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)280 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)17.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)100
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For New York: (min(280/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.17) × 0.3 + (100 − 100)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.7.

New York works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 280 Mbps, income tax 17%, cost index 100.

Healthcare

5.2fair
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)70
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)450
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For New York: (70/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 450/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 5.2.

New York has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~450 USD/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.

Score card · San Francisco
4.4/ 10 compositefair

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

0.0poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)120
  • Rent index (weight 40%)115
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For San Francisco: ((100 − 120)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 115)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 0.

San Francisco is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.0good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)45
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)72
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)68
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For San Francisco: (45/100 × 0.4 + 72/100 × 0.35 + 68/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.

San Francisco has a mixed quality profile. Safety: fair; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

6.7good
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)280 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)17.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)120
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For San Francisco: (min(280/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.17) × 0.3 + (100 − 120)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.7.

San Francisco works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 280 Mbps, income tax 17%, cost index 120.

Healthcare

5.0fair
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)72
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)500
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For San Francisco: (72/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 500/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 5.

San Francisco has trade-offs in healthcare: quality is good, typical out-of-pocket cost is ~500 USD/month. Cross-border insurance closes the gap.

Monthly cost delta: New York vs San Francisco

Normalized to USD at 1 USD = 1.0000 USD.

CategoryNew YorkSan FranciscoChange
housing$3,500$3,500+0%
food$600$700+17%
transport$130$80-38%
utilities$180$200+11%
leisure$600$700+17%
healthcare$450$500+11%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

New York64% housing
San Francisco62% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

Buying property

Apartment prices: New York vs San Francisco

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

City center — cheaper leads
New York
€13,500/m²
San Francisco
€13,000/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
New York
€8,500/m²
San Francisco
€8,500/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: New York vs San Francisco

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
New York
€130
San Francisco
€75
New York

MTA OMNY monthly cap at $132; the system runs 24/7 — one of only a handful globally — though weekend service is reduced.

Single ride: €2.7 · Modes: Metro, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry

San Francisco

Muni pass + BART; one of the few cities where the cable cars are still everyday transit, not just tourist rides.

Single ride: €2.8 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry, Cable car

Salary equivalence: New York ↔ San Francisco

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (New York = 100, San Francisco = 120); currency-converted at 1 USD = 1.0000 USD. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in New York, moving to San Francisco
USD → equivalent USD
New York grossSan Francisco equivalent
$40,000$48,000
$75,000$90,000
$120,000$144,000
Earning in San Francisco, moving to New York
USD → equivalent USD
San Francisco grossNew York equivalent
$40,000$33,333
$75,000$62,500
$120,000$100,000

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick New York

New York doesn't have any standout advantages of ≥0.3 points on the scoring model.

Why pick San Francisco

San Francisco doesn't have any standout advantages of ≥0.3 points on the scoring model.

New York trade-offs

No material trade-offs versus San Francisco on the scored axes.

San Francisco trade-offs

No material trade-offs versus New York on the scored axes.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: New York vs San Francisco

New York (America/New_York) and San Francisco (America/Los_Angeles) sit 3 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 5 hours a day.

New York

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native, extremely multilingual in practice (Spanish, Mandarin, Yiddish neighborhoods). English suffices for everything; other languages help in specific communities.

San Francisco

Official: English · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native. Significant Spanish and Mandarin presence in specific neighborhoods (Mission, Chinatown). English universal.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.0)
New York3.4/10
San Francisco3.4/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
New York by 0.2 points
New York5.7/10
San Francisco5.5/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.1)
New York3.8/10
San Francisco3.7/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.0)
New York0.0/10
San Francisco0.0/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-23 (New York) and 2026-05-28 (San Francisco).
  • FX rate. 1 USD = 1.0000 USD, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case New York is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

New York vs San Francisco: which is cheaper?

New York is roughly 4% cheaper than San Francisco on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). New York has cost index 100 vs San Francisco at 120 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

New York scores 4.5/10 on the Mundevo composite versus San Francisco at 4.4/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). New York wins overall by 0.1 points.

Is New York or San Francisco better for remote work?

New York has 280 Mbps median internet vs San Francisco at 280 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is New York bigger than San Francisco?

New York is larger — about 8.3M people versus San Francisco's 873k, roughly 9.5× the size.

Is New York safer than San Francisco?

New York scores higher on safety — 55 vs 45 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to New York or San Francisco?

It depends on what you weight. New York wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.1 points, but New York is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.