Mundevo
City comparison·Norway flagOslovsAustria flagVienna

Oslo vs Vienna: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between Oslo and Vienna? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

Vienna comes out ahead overall — by a narrow edge.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
Vienna flagVienna
Cheaper
Vienna flagVienna
Quality of life
Oslo flagOslo
Remote work
Oslo flagOslo

Composite scores

Overall: Vienna wins by 0.4 points

Oslo composite
6.7 / 10
good
Vienna composite
7.1 / 10
good

Population & size

Is Oslo bigger than Vienna?

Vienna is the bigger city: about 1.9M people versus Oslo's 700k — roughly 2.8× larger.

Oslo population
700k
700,000
Vienna population
1.9M
1,931,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

National income

Is Oslo richer than Vienna?

Norway and Austria earn almost the same: average annual wage of $74,864 and $75,767 (USD, purchasing-power adjusted).

Norway · average annual wage
$74,864
OECD, 2024 · USD PPP
Austria · average annual wage
$75,767
OECD, 2024 · USD PPP

Country-level figures — Oslo is not Norway and Vienna is not Austria, and both cities typically pay above their national average. Gross, before tax: see take-home pay by country for what lands in the account.

Distance

How far is Oslo from Vienna?

Oslo is about 1,350 km (840 mi) from Vienna in a straight line — roughly 2 h 20 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
1,350 km
In miles
840 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
2 h 20 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is Oslo warmer than Vienna?

Vienna is the warmer city: January highs average 3°C vs -2°C, and July 26°C vs 22°C. Vienna gets noticeably more sun — about 215 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
Oslo
1,670
Vienna
1,885 ✓
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
Oslo
760 mm
Vienna
580 mm ✓
MonthOsloVienna
January (high / low)-2° / -7°C3° / -2°C
July (high / low)22° / 12°C26° / 16°C
Oslo

Cold snowy winters with short daylight, warm bright summers. Mountains and fjords keep nature accessible year-round.

Vienna

Central-European continental. Cold winters, warm summers (occasional heatwaves), distinct seasons. Sunnier than Northern Europe.

Analyst take

Vienna edges Oslo by a narrow margin, suggesting both cities deliver comparable livability despite Vienna's slight advantage in overall quality-of-life metrics.

Vienna's 5.7 score trails far behind top-tier cities like Copenhagen or Singapore, indicating even strong European capitals face significant global competitiveness gaps.

What to do

If you're choosing between these two, prioritize sector-specific research—housing costs, transit speed, and job market—over the headline scores, which mask meaningful regional differences.

Data signals

What separates Oslo and Vienna

  • How decisive

    Vienna comes out ahead by 0.4 composite points — a narrow edge.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is healthcare, where Vienna leads by 1.4 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on quality of life — within 0.1 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in Vienna run about 29% lower than in Oslo.

  • Where budgets split most

    Leisure is the line item that diverges most: roughly 34% cheaper in Vienna than Oslo.

  • Size difference

    Vienna is the larger metro — about 2.8× the population of the other, which shapes commute times, housing supply and how "big-city" daily life feels.

  • Home internet

    Oslo has the faster typical broadband (180 vs 100 Mbps median) — worth weighing if you work remotely or move large files.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
Oslo
5.3/10
Vienna
6.4/10 ✓
Quality of life
Oslo
8.0/10 ✓
Vienna
7.9/10
Remote-work friendliness
Oslo
6.3/10 ✓
Vienna
5.6/10
Healthcare
Oslo
7.1/10
Vienna
8.5/10 ✓

The exact scores and winners:

AxisOsloViennaWinner
Affordability5.36.4Vienna +1.1
Quality of life8.07.9Oslo +0.1
Remote-work friendliness6.35.6Oslo +0.7
Healthcare7.18.5Vienna +1.4
Score card · Oslo
6.7/ 10 compositegood

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

5.3fair
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)52
  • Rent index (weight 40%)40
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Oslo: ((100 − 52)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 40)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 5.3.

Oslo is mid-range on absolute cost. Affordability is reasonable but not its main advantage.

Quality of life

8.0excellent
  • Safety index (weight 40%)78
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)82
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)82
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Oslo: (78/100 × 0.4 + 82/100 × 0.35 + 82/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 8.

Oslo scores good on safety, excellent on healthcare and excellent on air. The composite quality-of-life signal is strong.

Remote-work friendliness

6.3good
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)180 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)20.2%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)52
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Oslo: (min(180/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.202) × 0.3 + (100 − 52)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.3.

Oslo works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 180 Mbps, income tax 20%, cost index 52.

Healthcare

7.1good
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)82
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)277
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Oslo: (82/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 277/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 7.1.

Oslo combines excellent system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~277 NOK/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Score card · Vienna
7.1/ 10 compositegood

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

6.4good
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)40
  • Rent index (weight 40%)29
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Vienna: ((100 − 40)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 29)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 6.4.

Vienna is mid-range on absolute cost. Affordability is reasonable but not its main advantage.

Quality of life

7.9good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)78
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)82
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)75
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Vienna: (78/100 × 0.4 + 82/100 × 0.35 + 75/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.9.

Vienna scores good on safety, excellent on healthcare and good on air. The composite quality-of-life signal is strong.

Remote-work friendliness

5.6fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)100 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)15.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)40
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Vienna: (min(100/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.1496) × 0.3 + (100 − 40)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 5.6.

Vienna works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 100 Mbps, income tax 15%, cost index 40.

Healthcare

8.5excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)82
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)34
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Vienna: (82/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 34/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.5.

Vienna combines excellent system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~34 EUR/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Monthly cost delta: Oslo vs Vienna

Normalized to NOK at 1 EUR = 10.8300 NOK.

CategoryOsloViennaChange
housingNOK 18,923€1,161-34%
foodNOK 5,071€392-16%
transportNOK 800€51-31%
utilitiesNOK 3,969€296-19%
leisureNOK 4,610€280-34%
healthcareNOK 277€34+33%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

Oslo56% housing
Vienna52% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is housing: Oslo spends 3.8 percentage points more of its budget on it (56% vs. 52%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: Oslo vs Vienna

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central Vienna runs about 12% cheaper per square meter (€7,500/m² vs €8,500/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
Oslo
€8,500/m²
Vienna
€7,500/m² ✓
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
Oslo
€6,500/m²
Vienna
€5,500/m² ✓

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: Oslo vs Vienna

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
Oslo
€78
Vienna
€42 ✓
Oslo

Ruter zone-1 pass; ferries to Hovedøya / Bygdøy peninsulas are included, useful in summer.

Day pass: €9.8 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry

Vienna

€365/year annual pass = €1/day, the most-cited "why is Vienna so liveable" data point. Monthly equivalent shown.

Single ride: €2.4 · Modes: Metro, Tram, Bus, Commuter rail

Salary equivalence: Oslo ↔ Vienna

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Oslo = 52, Vienna = 40); currency-converted at 1 EUR = 10.8300 NOK. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in Oslo, moving to Vienna
NOK → equivalent EUR
Oslo grossVienna equivalent
NOK 40,000€2,841
NOK 75,000€5,327
NOK 120,000€8,523
Earning in Vienna, moving to Oslo
EUR → equivalent NOK
Vienna grossOslo equivalent
€40,000NOK 563,160
€75,000NOK 1,055,925
€120,000NOK 1,689,480

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick Oslo

  • Wins on remote-work friendliness (+0.7 points vs Vienna).

Why pick Vienna

  • Wins on affordability (+1.1 points vs Oslo).
  • Wins on healthcare (+1.4 points vs Oslo).

Oslo trade-offs

  • Trails Vienna on affordability by 1.1 points.
  • Trails Vienna on healthcare by 1.4 points.

Vienna trade-offs

  • Trails Oslo on remote-work friendliness by 0.7 points.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: Oslo vs Vienna

Oslo (Europe/Oslo) and Vienna (Europe/Vienna) share the same standard-time offset — meetings, markets and deadlines line up 1:1.

Oslo

Official: Norwegian · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

Nordic norm — English everywhere. Norwegian is easier than Danish acoustically and useful for full integration but not required for tech / corporate work.

Vienna

Official: German · English: Moderate · Local language: Useful

Standard German for bureaucracy; English usable in the international district (1st-3rd Bezirks) and IAEA/UN-adjacent workplaces. Austrian dialect colors local speech.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Vienna by 0.2 points
Oslo5.8/10
Vienna6.0/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
Vienna by 0.6 points
Oslo7.5/10
Vienna8.2/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Vienna by 0.8 points
Oslo6.8/10
Vienna7.6/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Vienna by 1.1 points
Oslo5.3/10
Vienna6.4/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Zoom out from cities to countries: compare Norway vs Austria on average wage, take-home after tax and cost of living.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-05-28 (Oslo) and 2026-05-28 (Vienna).
  • FX rate. 1 EUR = 10.8300 NOK, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Oslo is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

Oslo vs Vienna: which is cheaper?

Vienna is roughly 29% cheaper than Oslo on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Oslo has cost index 52 vs Vienna at 40 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

Oslo scores 6.7/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Vienna at 7.1/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Vienna wins overall by 0.4 points.

Is Oslo or Vienna better for remote work?

Oslo has 180 Mbps median internet vs Vienna at 100 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is Oslo bigger than Vienna?

Vienna is larger — about 1.9M people versus Oslo's 700k, roughly 2.8× the size.

Is Oslo safer than Vienna?

Oslo and Vienna score similarly on safety (78 vs 78 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index).

Should I move to Oslo or Vienna?

It depends on what you weight. Vienna wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.4 points, but Vienna is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.