Mundevo
City comparison·Belgium flagAntwerpvsNew Zealand flagWellington

Antwerp vs Wellington: cost, size & quality of life compared

Trying to decide between Antwerp and Wellington? Here's the honest bottom line first — then the full, sourced breakdown on cost of living, salary, safety and quality of life.

The bottom line

Antwerp and Wellington are almost dead even overall.

But the "winner" depends on what you care about. Here's who takes each dimension:

Overall
Wellington flagWellington
Cheaper
Antwerp flagAntwerp
Quality of life
Wellington flagWellington
Remote work
Wellington flagWellington

Composite scores

Overall: Wellington wins by 0.1 points

Antwerp composite
6.0 / 10
good
Wellington composite
6.1 / 10
good

Population & size

Is Antwerp bigger than Wellington?

Antwerp is the bigger city: about 530k people versus Wellington's 420k — roughly 1.3× larger.

Antwerp population
530k
530,000
Wellington population
420k
420,000

City-proper / metro population estimates. Size is one input — scroll on for cost of living, salary equivalence and quality-of-life scoring.

Distance

How far is Antwerp from Wellington?

Antwerp is about 18,690 km (11,610 mi) from Wellington in a straight line — roughly 22 h 45 m of nonstop flight time.

Straight-line
18,690 km
In miles
11,610 mi
Nonstop flight (est.)
22 h 45 m

Great-circle distance, not a routed itinerary; flight estimate assumes ~850 km/h cruise plus 45 minutes of taxi, climb and descent.

Climate

Is Antwerp warmer than Wellington?

Wellington is the warmer city: January highs average 21°C vs 6°C, and July 12°C vs 23°C. Wellington gets noticeably more sun — about 470 more sunshine hours per year.

Sunshine hours / year
Antwerp
1,580
Wellington
2,050
Rainfall (mm / year) — drier leads
Antwerp
830 mm
Wellington
1,250 mm
MonthAntwerpWellington
January (high / low)6° / 1°C21° / 14°C
July (high / low)23° / 13°C12° / 6°C
Antwerp

Same oceanic regime as Brussels — mild wet winters, moderate summers, persistent cloud cover. Slightly breezier near the Scheldt estuary.

Wellington

Cool oceanic and famously windy — the Cook Strait funnels gales year-round. Mild summers, chilly damp winters; temperature extremes are rare.

Analyst take

Wellington edges out Antwerp on the Mundevo composite, 6.1 to 6.0 out of 10 — a narrow 0.1-point margin across safety, healthcare, air quality and cost.

The composite gap is small enough that one weighted axis can flip the result. Use the per-axis breakdown below to see which city wins your specific priorities — someone optimizing for healthcare can land on a different answer than someone optimizing for affordability.

What to do

Run the salary calculator for both cities at your target lifestyle before deciding — Wellington winning on quality doesn't mean the gross-salary requirement also lands in your favor. If you're on a balanced tier, the cost-of-living pages for each city carry the full monthly basket and the gross-salary figure.

Data signals

What separates Antwerp and Wellington

  • How decisive

    Wellington comes out ahead by 0.1 composite points — essentially a tie.

  • Biggest difference

    The widest gap is quality of life, where Wellington leads by 1.0 points.

  • Where they match

    They're most evenly matched on remote-work friendliness — within 0.1 points of each other.

  • Overall cost gap

    Total monthly costs in Wellington run about 7% higher than in Antwerp.

  • Where budgets split most

    Transport is the line item that diverges most: roughly 44% pricier in Wellington than Antwerp.

  • Safety

    Wellington scores higher on safety (68 vs 55 / 100) — a common deciding factor for families.

Score-by-score, side-by-side

Each axis is scored independently with disclosed weights and a calculation string.

Affordability
Antwerp
4.4/10
Wellington
3.8/10
Quality of life
Antwerp
6.5/10
Wellington
7.5/10
Remote-work friendliness
Antwerp
4.8/10
Wellington
4.9/10
Healthcare
Antwerp
8.3/10
Wellington
8.0/10

The exact scores and winners:

AxisAntwerpWellingtonWinner
Affordability4.43.8Antwerp +0.6
Quality of life6.57.5Wellington +1.0
Remote-work friendliness4.84.9Wellington +0.1
Healthcare8.38.0Antwerp +0.3
Score card · Antwerp
6.0/ 10 compositegood

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

4.4fair
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)71
  • Rent index (weight 40%)34
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Antwerp: ((100 − 71)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 34)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 4.4.

Antwerp is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

6.5good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)55
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)78
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)64
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Antwerp: (55/100 × 0.4 + 78/100 × 0.35 + 64/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 6.5.

Antwerp has a mixed quality profile. Safety: good; healthcare: good; air: good. Weigh the weakest axis against your personal priorities.

Remote-work friendliness

4.8fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)120 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)25.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)71
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Antwerp: (min(120/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.25) × 0.3 + (100 − 71)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.8.

Antwerp works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 120 Mbps, income tax 25%, cost index 71.

Healthcare

8.3excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)78
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)30
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Antwerp: (78/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 30/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.3.

Antwerp combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~30 EUR/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Score card · Wellington
6.1/ 10 compositegood

Each axis is a weighted aggregate of underlying indicators normalized to a 0–10 scale. Weights are explicit and disclosed per axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes — axes are not collapsed further because the underlying trade-offs (e.g. low cost vs poor air quality) are user-dependent.

Affordability

3.8poor
  • Cost-of-living index (weight 60%)74
  • Rent index (weight 40%)44
How this is calculated

Affordability = ((100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − rentIndex)/100 × 0.4) × 10. For Wellington: ((100 − 74)/100 × 0.6 + (100 − 44)/100 × 0.4) × 10 = 3.8.

Wellington is among the more expensive cities tracked. Salary expectations should be calibrated to the high cost base before relocating.

Quality of life

7.5good
  • Safety index (weight 40%)68
  • Healthcare index (weight 35%)75
  • Air quality index (weight 25%)88
How this is calculated

QoL = (safety/100 × 0.4 + healthcare/100 × 0.35 + airQuality/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Wellington: (68/100 × 0.4 + 75/100 × 0.35 + 88/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 7.5.

Wellington scores good on safety, good on healthcare and excellent on air. The composite quality-of-life signal is strong.

Remote-work friendliness

4.9fair
  • Internet (median Mbps) (weight 45%)120 Mbps
  • Effective income tax (lower = better) (weight 30%)17.0%
  • Cost-of-living (lower = better) (weight 25%)74
How this is calculated

RemoteWork = (min(Mbps/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − incomeTax) × 0.3 + (100 − costIndex)/100 × 0.25) × 10. For Wellington: (min(120/300, 1) × 0.45 + (1 − 0.17) × 0.3 + (100 − 74)/100 × 0.25) × 10 = 4.9.

Wellington works for remote work but isn't optimized for it: internet 120 Mbps, income tax 17%, cost index 74.

Healthcare

8.0excellent
  • Healthcare quality index (weight 70%)75
  • Healthcare out-of-pocket / month (lower = better) (weight 30%)50
How this is calculated

Healthcare = (qualityIndex/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − OOP/500) × 0.3) × 10. For Wellington: (75/100 × 0.7 + max(0, 1 − 50/500) × 0.3) × 10 = 8.

Wellington combines good system quality with a manageable out-of-pocket cost (~50 NZD/month). Travel insurance still recommended for non-residents.

Monthly cost delta: Antwerp vs Wellington

Normalized to EUR at 1 NZD = 0.5556 EUR.

CategoryAntwerpWellingtonChange
housing€950NZ$2,200+29%
food€360NZ$580-10%
transport€50NZ$130+44%
utilities€195NZ$230-34%
leisure€390NZ$600-15%
healthcare€30NZ$50-7%

Where each city's money goes

Two cities can have the same monthly total but very different shapes — one might burn 50% on housing while the other splits more evenly. The composition matters as much as the headline.

Antwerp48% housing
Wellington58% housing
housing
food
transport
utilities
leisure
healthcare

The biggest shape difference is housing: Wellington spends 9.9 percentage points more of its budget on it (58% vs. 48%). If you're sensitive to that category, weight the per-axis scores accordingly.

Buying property

Apartment prices: Antwerp vs Wellington

Approximate asking prices in EUR per square meter (as of 2025-01), central vs mid-distance neighborhoods.

Buying in central Antwerp runs about 42% cheaper per square meter (€3,900/m² vs €6,700/m²).

City center — cheaper leads
Antwerp
€3,900/m²
Wellington
€6,700/m²
Outside center (5-15 km) — cheaper leads
Antwerp
€2,700/m²
Wellington
€3,600/m²

Midpoints of public listing ranges — a scoping number for rent-vs-buy thinking, not a valuation. Renting comparisons live in the cost table above.

Getting around

Public transport: Antwerp vs Wellington

Monthly pass and casual-ride pricing in EUR (as of 2025-01) plus the modes each network runs.

Monthly pass — cheaper leads
Antwerp
€58
Wellington
€100.4
Antwerp

De Lijn Omnipas €58/mo after the April 2025 tariff round (+18%); premetro trams run underground through the centre.

Single ride: €3 · Modes: Tram, Bus

Wellington

Metlink buses + four commuter rail lines with Snapper tap fares; the 1902 cable car is genuine commuter kit, not just a postcard.

Single ride: €2.78 · Modes: Bus, Commuter rail, Ferry, Cable car

Salary equivalence: Antwerp ↔ Wellington

What earning the same purchasing power costs in each city. Cost-adjusted using the local cost-of-living index (Antwerp = 71, Wellington = 74); currency-converted at 1 NZD = 0.5556 EUR. Tax differences are not modeled.

Earning in Antwerp, moving to Wellington
EUR → equivalent NZD
Antwerp grossWellington equivalent
€40,000NZ$75,042
€75,000NZ$140,704
€120,000NZ$225,127
Earning in Wellington, moving to Antwerp
NZD → equivalent EUR
Wellington grossAntwerp equivalent
NZ$40,000€21,321
NZ$75,000€39,977
NZ$120,000€63,964

Equivalence here means same cost-of-living purchasing power, not same net take-home. Effective tax rates differ between countries; a salary equivalent on cost can still net more or less depending on the destination's tax regime. Use the calculator for tax-adjusted figures at a specific lifestyle tier.

Pros and cons

Why pick Antwerp

  • Wins on affordability (+0.6 points vs Wellington).
  • Wins on healthcare (+0.3 points vs Wellington).

Why pick Wellington

  • Wins on quality of life (+1.0 points vs Antwerp).

Antwerp trade-offs

  • Trails Wellington on quality of life by 1.0 points.

Wellington trade-offs

  • Trails Antwerp on affordability by 0.6 points.

Remote work logistics

Time zones and language: Antwerp vs Wellington

Antwerp (Europe/Brussels) and Wellington (Pacific/Auckland) sit 11 hours apart in standard time. A 9-to-5 in one overlaps the other's for 8 hours a day.

Antwerp

Official: Dutch · English: High · Local language: Helpful

Flemish (Dutch) city with the Dutch-typical high English fluency. English is workable in daily life and the port/diamond trades; Dutch matters for admin and integration.

Wellington

Official: English, Māori · English: Native-equivalent · Local language: Not needed

English-native, government city. Māori is co-official and used ceremonially; English is universal.

Who should choose which

The composite winner doesn't always match what matters to you. These four reader profiles weigh the axes differently — find the closest fit.

Young remote pro

Single, salaried remote worker, 25-40, optimizing for runway + bandwidth.

Best fit
Antwerp by 0.3 points
Antwerp4.6/10
Wellington4.3/10

Axes scored: affordability, remoteWork

Family with kids

Couple with school-age children, prioritizing safety, healthcare, and air quality.

Best fit
Wellington by 0.3 points
Antwerp7.4/10
Wellington7.8/10

Axes scored: qualityOfLife, healthcare

Retiree

Fixed income, healthcare-sensitive, prefers low cost and stable infrastructure.

Best fit
Roughly tied (gap 0.0)
Antwerp6.4/10
Wellington6.4/10

Axes scored: healthcare, qualityOfLife, affordability

Cost-conscious mover

Salary stretch matters most. Cuts everything else if it lowers the burn rate.

Best fit
Antwerp by 0.6 points
Antwerp4.4/10
Wellington3.8/10

Axes scored: affordability

Profiles use simple axis averaging — for a deeper read with your own weights, use the per-axis breakdown above.

Zoom out from cities to countries: compare Belgium vs New Zealand on average wage, take-home after tax and cost of living.

Methodology

How this page is calculated

Data sources

  • Mundevo per-city dataset. Cost basket, rent index, safety, healthcare, air quality and median internet for both cities. Reference date: 2026-06-10 (Antwerp) and 2026-06-10 (Wellington).
  • FX rate. 1 NZD = 0.5556 EUR, used to normalize cost baskets.
  • CityScoreCalculator. Four axes (Affordability, Quality of life, Remote work, Healthcare) computed with explicit weights and explanations. See per-axis calculation strings rendered on this page.
  • ComparisonService. Per-category cost deltas (housing, food, transport, utilities, leisure, healthcare) normalized to the origin currency.

Update cadence

Data as of . Last reviewed .

Calculation

For each of the four axes we compute an independent 0–10 score using the formulas printed beside each axis. The composite is the unweighted mean of the four axes. The overall winner is the city with the higher composite, unless the margin is under 0.05 points — in which case Antwerp is shown first as a tiebreaker to keep results stable.

Limitations

  • Climate is not scored — we don't yet hold a maintained climate dataset, so weather-driven preferences are not modeled.
  • Tax differences between cities in the same country are not modeled (Spain and Germany don't have material regional differences for this dataset).
  • Indices are population-level. Personal cost varies with neighborhood, employer benefits and family status.
  • Quality-of-life axis weights (safety 0.4 / healthcare 0.35 / air 0.25) are editorial defaults — readers with strong preferences should re-weight manually.

Frequently asked questions

Antwerp vs Wellington: which is cheaper?

Antwerp is roughly 7% cheaper than Wellington on the monthly cost basket (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare). Antwerp has cost index 71 vs Wellington at 74 (both with New York = 100).

Which city has better quality of life?

Antwerp scores 6.0/10 on the Mundevo composite versus Wellington at 6.1/10. The composite weights safety (40%), healthcare (35%) and air quality (25%). Wellington wins overall by 0.1 points.

Is Antwerp or Wellington better for remote work?

Antwerp has 120 Mbps median internet vs Wellington at 120 Mbps. The four-axis decision rubric on this page (affordability, quality of life, remote work, healthcare) gives a per-dimension breakdown rather than a single answer.

Is Antwerp bigger than Wellington?

Antwerp is larger — about 530k people versus Wellington's 420k, roughly 1.3× the size.

Is Antwerp safer than Wellington?

Wellington scores higher on safety — 68 vs 55 / 100 on the Mundevo safety index (crime and personal-security signals).

Should I move to Antwerp or Wellington?

It depends on what you weight. Wellington wins the overall Mundevo composite by 0.1 points, but Antwerp is cheaper, and the two split differently across affordability, quality of life, remote work and healthcare. Use the per-axis table and the reader-profile section above to match the verdict to your own priorities.